Cheong Yong Yin (Beramal Sebagai Ernest Cheong Plt Chartered Surveyors, Ve(3) 0017) v BANDAR UTAMA CITY ASSETS SDN BHD
wa-24ncvc-104-01-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 25 March 2025 • WA-24NCvC-104-01/2025 • 3 min read
Catchwords
Introduction 1. The Plaintiff by way of this Originating Summons (“OS”) is seeking to set aside a decision of the Magistrate given on 3/8/2020 in a civil suit WA-A72-15-01/2019. 2. The provisions of law mentioned in the intitulement of the OS are Order 7, 28,, 5(3) &(4) and 92(4) of the Rules of Court 2012 (“the Rules”). 3. It is pointless to reproduce all the provisions of the Rules mentioned in the intitulement as all are general provisions Suffice if Order 7(2) 1A is reproduced here: 2. Forms of originating summons (O. 7 r. 2) (1A) Every originating summons shall state in its intitulement any provision of these Rules and any provision of any written law under which the Court is being moved. Conclusion 8. In the upshot the Court refuses to exercise its revisionary powers as there are no reason to do so and thereby dismisses the OS with a cost of RM2,000.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Statutes Cited
Rules of Court 2012
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-24ncvc-104-01-2025)