Adam Primus Varghese Bin Abdullah v KHEE SAN FOOD INDUSTRIES SDN. BHD.
Catchwords
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Originating summons – Application to convert to writ action – Whether substantial factual disputes exist requiring trial – Whether documentary evidence sufficient for determination – Whether cross-examination under Order 38 Rule 2 adequate alternative to conversion – Whether conversion justified by proposed counterclaim COMPANY LAW: Judicial management – Interim Judicial Manager's remuneration – Assessment of reasonableness of remuneration claim – Whether detailed statement of work sufficient without oral testimony – Whether composite hourly rate requires examination through trial – Whether work performed by team members requires individual verification – Assessment of pre-appointment and post-termination work – Whether contemporaneous documentation adequate for remuneration determination INSOLVENCY LAW: Remuneration of insolvency practitioners – Statutory requirements under Section 407(4) Companies Act 2016 – Whether taxation-like process required for assessment – Whether Court determination adequate based on documentary evidence – Assessment of work undertaken in course of administration – Whether fair and reasonable remuneration determinable without trial
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Case Significance
Adam Primus Varghese Bin Abdullah v KHEE SAN FOOD INDUSTRIES SDN. BHD. is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 20, 2025 (citation: wa-24ncc-455-09-2024). The case was decided by Atan Mustaffa Yussof Ahmad.
What was the outcome of Adam Primus Varghese Bin Abdullah v KHEE SAN FOOD INDUSTRIES SDN. BHD.?
Adam Primus Varghese Bin Abdullah v KHEE SAN FOOD INDUSTRIES SDN. BHD. is a High Court decision dated January 20, 2025. The case was heard by Atan Mustaffa Yussof Ahmad. See the full judgment for details.