Chen Teck Shin v Foo Chi Mei BUKAN PIHAK-PIHAK TANG POOI FUN

wa-24f-262-07-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 13 April 2026 • WA-24F-262-07/2022 • 11 min read

5 cases cited (0 SG, 5 foreign)

Outcome

I therefore dismiss the PH’s application to vary the Order dated 07.02.2023.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-24f-262-07-2022). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Plaintiff Husband's (PH) application against the Defendant Wife (DW) to vary the Court Order dated 07.02.2023 made pursuant to Section 96 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 and Order 92 Rule 4 of the Rules of Court 2012.

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure Family Law

Judges (1)

Sumathi a/p Murugiah Delivered

Counsel (7)

Francis Pereira & Shan Firm Kee Sern, Siu & Huey Firm Denise Lim Counsel Petitioner Francis Pereira Counsel Respondent Goh Siu Lin Counsel Petitioner Gowri Ramanathan Counsel Respondent Teoh Xin Ning Counsel Petitioner

Parties (3)

Chen Teck Shin Applicant Foo Chi Mei Respondent Tang Pooi Fun Non Party

Cases Cited (5)

MY (5)

[1981] CLJ 124 [1981] CLJ 65 [1996] 4 MLJ 171 [2006] 5 CLJ 318 [2019] MLJU 715

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24f-262-07-2022)