MRCB Sentral Properties Sdn Bhd v GSIB Sdn Bhd

wa-24carb-44-10-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 29 January 2026 • WA-24C(ARB)-44-10/2025 • 3 min read

Catchwords

There are two originating summons filed under the Arbitration Act 2005 to set aside and enforce a Final Award arising from a construction arbitration. The legal issue was whether the Award should be set aside under section 37(1)(b)(ii) on grounds of breach of natural justice and conflict with public policy. The High Court held that the Arbitrator’s findings on delay analysis, extension of time and LAD were decisions on the merits, disclosed no material breach of natural justice, dismissed the setting-aside application, and allowed recognition and enforcement under section 38.

Practice Areas

There are two originating summons filed under the Arbitration Act 2005 to set aside and enforce a Final Award arising from a construction arbitration. The legal issue was whether the Award should be set aside under section 37(1)(b)(ii) on grounds of breach of natural justice and conflict with public policy. The High Court held that the Arbitrator’s findings on delay analysis, extension of time and LAD were decisions on the merits, disclosed no material breach of natural justice, dismissed the setting-aside application, and allowed recognition and enforcement under section 38.

Judges (1)

Azlan bin Sulaiman Delivered

Parties (2)

GSIB Sdn Bhd Respondent MRCB SENTRAL PROPERTIES Sdn Bhd Applicant

Case Significance

MRCB Sentral Properties Sdn Bhd v GSIB Sdn Bhd is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 29, 2026 (citation: wa-24carb-44-10-2025). The case was decided by Azlan bin Sulaiman.

What was the outcome of MRCB Sentral Properties Sdn Bhd v GSIB Sdn Bhd?

MRCB Sentral Properties Sdn Bhd v GSIB Sdn Bhd is a High Court decision dated January 29, 2026. The case was heard by Azlan bin Sulaiman. See the full judgment for details.