FUJI XEROX ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD v 1. ) ROHANA BINTI AWAL 2. ) HASNADI BIN SUPATHIR

wa-22ncvc-739-11-2018 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 23 June 2025 • WA-22NCvC-739-11/2018

Catchwords

Enclosures 10 and 28 are the defendants' applications for leave to file the said applications out of time as well as their applications to set aside the Judgment in Default dated 12 December 2018 ("JID"). The Court finds that the service of the JID was regular. The defendants also failed to raise meritorious defences. Moreover, the defendants did not explain why both Enclosure 10 and Enclosure 28 were filed late.

Practice Areas

Enclosures 10 and 28 are the defendants' applications for leave to file the said applications out of time as well as their applications to set aside the Judgment in Default dated 12 December 2018 ("JID"). The Court finds that the service of the JID was regular. The defendants also failed to raise meritorious defences. Moreover, the defendants did not explain why both Enclosure 10 and Enclosure 28 were filed late.

Judges (1)

Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan Delivered

Parties (3)

FUJI XEROX ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD Plaintiff Hasnadi bin Supathir Defendant Rohana binti Awal Defendant

Case Significance

FUJI XEROX ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD v 1. ) ROHANA BINTI AWAL 2. ) HASNADI BIN SUP... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 23, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-739-11-2018). The case was decided by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan.

What was the outcome of FUJI XEROX ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD v 1. ) ROHANA BINTI AWAL 2. ) HASNADI BIN SUP...?

FUJI XEROX ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD v 1. ) ROHANA BINTI AWAL 2. ) HASNADI BIN SUP... is a High Court decision dated June 23, 2025. The case was heard by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan. See the full judgment for details.