CHEAH TING FENG v PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN BANYAN TREE SIGNATURES PAVILION KUALA LUMPUR
Catchwords
Plaintiff’s application for an ad interim injunction vide seeking to restrain the Defendant, from enforcing a by-law that prohibits short-term rental (“STR”) activities within the residential component and from issuing further notices, invoices, or fines pending disposal of the main suit. Plaintiff sought the following interim reliefs: (a) An injunction to restrain the MC from enforcing or imposing the fines and invoices above referred to; (b) An injunction to restrain the MC from issuing further notices or fines in respect of the prohibition on STR activities; and (c) An injunction to restrain the MC from deactivating the Plaintiff’s access cards or restricting entry to his units and common facilities. Court must be satisfied that: (a) there is a serious issue to be tried; (b) damages would not be an adequate remedy; (c) the balance of convenience lies in favour of granting the injunction; and (d) the injunction sought will preserve, and not alter, the status quo.
Practice Areas
Plaintiff’s application for an ad interim injunction vide seeking to restrain the Defendant, from enforcing a by-law that prohibits short-term rental (“STR”) activities within the residential component and from issuing further notices, invoices, or fines pending disposal of the main suit. Plaintiff sought the following interim reliefs: (a) An injunction to restrain the MC from enforcing or imposing the fines and invoices above referred to; (b) An injunction to restrain the MC from issuing further notices or fines in respect of the prohibition on STR activities; and (c) An injunction to restrain the MC from deactivating the Plaintiff’s access cards or restricting entry to his units and common facilities. Court must be satisfied that: (a) there is a serious issue to be tried; (b) damages would not be an adequate remedy; (c) the balance of convenience lies in favour of granting the injunction; and (d) the injunction sought will preserve, and not alter, the status quo.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
CHEAH TING FENG v PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN BANYAN TREE SIGNATURES PAVILION KUALA... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 22, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-693-11-2024). The case was decided by Mahazan binti Mat Taib.
Key issues: Court must be satisfied that:.
What was the outcome of CHEAH TING FENG v PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN BANYAN TREE SIGNATURES PAVILION KUALA...?
CHEAH TING FENG v PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN BANYAN TREE SIGNATURES PAVILION KUALA... is a High Court decision dated June 22, 2025. The case was heard by Mahazan binti Mat Taib. See the full judgment for details.