HASILHARTA (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD. v 1. ) IDEAL ADVANTAGE SDN. BHD. 2. ) Vast Diversified Sdn. Bhd.

wa-22ncvc-681-09-2019 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 24 February 2025 • WA-22NCvC-681-09/2019 • 20 min read
11 cases cited (0 SG, 11 foreign)

Outcome

CONCLUSION [9] In light of the foregoing, after considering the facts, the evidence545 adduced at the trial, the parties' respective written and oral submissions, I allowed only part of the plaintiff’s claim for damages and cost of RM5,000.00 to be paid to the plaintiff within 30 days from the date of this order.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-22ncvc-681-09-2019). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

The plaintiff (P) filed a Notice of Assessment for Damages under O.37 r.1 Rules of Court 2012 (RC 2012), against the First Defendant (D1). On 25.02.2025, after considering the facts, the evidence adduced, and the parties' submissions, I allowed part of P’s claim for damages and costs of RM5000.00 to be paid to the plaintiff within 30 days from the date of the order.

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz Delivered

Counsel (5)

Azwar & Partners Firm Jeffrey Tan & Chng Firm Lock Jun Qi Counsel Plaintiff Muhammad Azwar bin Ab Manab Counsel Defendant Sean Tan Tee Li Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (3)

HASILHARTA Sdn Bhd Plaintiff IDEAL ADVANTAGE Sdn Bhd Defendant Vast Diversified Sdn Bhd Defendant

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (11)

MY (11)
[1989] 2 MLRH 705 [1989] 3 MLJ 360 [1990] 2 CLJ 635 [1993] 3 MLJ 352 [1997] 3 CLJ 504 [1997] 3 MLJ 531 [2020] 1 MLJ 37 [2021] 5 MLJ 408 [2022] 2 CLJ 81 [2024] 4 MLJ 749 [2024] MLJU 909

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-681-09-2019)