MH GROUP SDN BHD v LABUAN SHIPYARD & ENGINEERING SDN BHD

wa-22ncvc-629-10-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 15 April 2025 • WA-22NCvC-629-10/2024

Catchwords

In Enclosure 12, the plaintiff is seeking the amount of RM1,315,303.00 in summary judgment under Order 14 of the Rules of Court 2012 (“ROC 2012”) for the alleged maintenance services rendered to the defendant. Meanwhile, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff did not render such services to it. The court found that not only that the parties had a binding contract between them but that the first objection to the issue of payment raised by the defendant only came about after the action has been filed, which was not contemporaneous with the material time of the event. As a result, Enclosure 12 is allowed with costs of RM5,000.00, subject to allocatur.

Practice Areas

In Enclosure 12, the plaintiff is seeking the amount of RM1,315,303.00 in summary judgment under Order 14 of the Rules of Court 2012 (“ROC 2012”) for the alleged maintenance services rendered to the defendant. Meanwhile, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff did not render such services to it. The court found that not only that the parties had a binding contract between them but that the first objection to the issue of payment raised by the defendant only came about after the action has been filed, which was not contemporaneous with the material time of the event. As a result, Enclosure 12 is allowed with costs of RM5,000.00, subject to allocatur.

Judges (1)

Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan Delivered

Parties (2)

LABUAN SHIPYARD & ENGINEERING Sdn Bhd Defendant MH GROUP Sdn Bhd Plaintiff

Case Significance

MH GROUP SDN BHD v LABUAN SHIPYARD & ENGINEERING SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 15, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-629-10-2024). The case was decided by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan.

What was the outcome of MH GROUP SDN BHD v LABUAN SHIPYARD & ENGINEERING SDN BHD?

MH GROUP SDN BHD v LABUAN SHIPYARD & ENGINEERING SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated April 15, 2025. The case was heard by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan. See the full judgment for details.