1. ) UMAR BIN ALI BASHAH @ ALI BASHAH 2. ) TETUAN LOGHAN LAW OFFICE v 1. ) MUJUR ZAMAN SDN. BHD. 2. ) LIPUTAN CANGGIH SDN. BHD. 3. ) HADRONS CONSULTING SDN. BHD. 4. ) TETUAN ABRAHAM OOI & PARTNERS (CJ 23.12.21) PIHAK KETIGA TETUAN DAIM & GAMANY

wa-22ncvc-575-08-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 12 August 2025 • WA-22NCvC-575-08/2021

Catchwords

Civil procedure - Application to strike out amended defence and counterclaim - Application for stay of proceedings - Order 18 r 19(1)(b) and (d) and/or Order 92 r 4 Rules of Court 2012 - Whether amended defence is an abuse of process of court - Whether striking out pleadings justified - Whether stay of proceedings appropriate pending disposal of related appeals - Principles governing stay of proceedings - Nexus between current case and related civil suits - Inherent jurisdiction of court to prevent injustice.

Practice Areas

Civil procedure

Judges (1)

Eddie Yeo Soon Chye Delivered

Parties (7)

HADRONS CONSULTING Sdn Bhd Defendant LIPUTAN CANGGIH Sdn Bhd Defendant MUJUR ZAMAN Sdn Bhd Defendant TETUAN ABRAHAM OOI & PARTNERS (CJ 23.12.21) Defendant TETUAN DAIM & GAMANY Third Party TETUAN LOGHAN LAW OFFICE Plaintiff Umar bin Ali Bashah @ Ali Bashah Plaintiff

Case Significance

1. ) UMAR BIN ALI BASHAH @ ALI BASHAH 2. ) TETUAN LOGHAN LAW OFFICE v 1. ) MU... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 12, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-575-08-2021). The case was decided by Eddie Yeo Soon Chye.

What was the outcome of 1. ) UMAR BIN ALI BASHAH @ ALI BASHAH 2. ) TETUAN LOGHAN LAW OFFICE v 1. ) MU...?

1. ) UMAR BIN ALI BASHAH @ ALI BASHAH 2. ) TETUAN LOGHAN LAW OFFICE v 1. ) MU... is a High Court decision dated August 12, 2025. The case was heard by Eddie Yeo Soon Chye. See the full judgment for details.