Ramlah Binti Abd Aziz v ECO COMMERCIAL VEHICLES SDN. BHD.

wa-22ncvc-206-04-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 9 June 2024 • WA-22NCvC-206-04/2020 • 27 min read
6 cases cited (0 SG, 6 foreign)

Outcome

Additionally, I allow the Defendant’s counterclaim under sub- paragraphs 52(g), (h), (i), and (j) of the Statement of Defence namely :-.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-22ncvc-206-04-2020). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Contract Law – Sale and Purchase Agreement – Outright sale or security transaction – Tenancy Agreement – Repurchase option – Termination – Restitution – Misrepresentation – Inducement – Due diligence – Nullity of contract Evidence Law – Evidence Act 1950, ss. 101, 103, 114(g) – Burden of proof – Balance of probabilities – Adverse inference – Documentary evidence v. oral testimony – Bare denial – Corroborating evidence Land Law – Private caveat – Removal and prohibition of caveat – National Land Code 1965, s. 329 – Proprietary rights – Land use restrictions – Commercial use of residential property Civil Procedure – Counterclaim – Estoppel – Costs – Declaratory relief – Restitutionary relief

Practice Areas

Land Law Contract Evidence Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

John Lee Kien How @ Mohammad Johan Lee Delivered

Counsel (5)

Chambers Of Koon Firm S. Ravichandran & Anuar Firm S. Ravichandran Counsel Plaintiff Sim Kok Yew Counsel Defendant Tan Yong Koon Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

ECO COMMERCIAL VEHICLES Sdn Bhd Defendant Ramlah binti Abd Aziz Plaintiff

Statutes Cited

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
s 101 s 103
National Land Code (Cap 828)

Cases Cited (6)

MY (6)
[1970] MLJ 197 [1983] 2 MLJ 196 [1994] 1 MLJ 740 [1995] 4 CLJ 283 [1996] 4 CLJ 1 [2014] 8 CLJ 83

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-206-04-2020)