LIM CHEE MENG v VENUS ASSETS SDN BHD

wa-22ncvc-105-02-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 8 April 2025 • WA-22NCvC-105-02/2021

Catchwords

In a Notice of Application dated 11 May 2021 [Enclosure 7], the plaintiff seeks summary judgment against the defendant under Order 14 rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012 ("ROC 2012"). One of the claims included damages for the late delivery of the property. The court found that the defendant had not raised any triable issues. This is because the Amended Defence indicated there was no dispute about the 265-day delay. Despite the defendant's assertion that the SPA neither prohibits nor bars the plaintiff from claiming damages against it, the defendant was willing to compensate the plaintiff on proof of loss. In light of this, the defendant's liability was justifiable.

Practice Areas

In a Notice of Application dated 11 May 2021 Enclosure 7, the plaintiff seeks summary judgment against the defendant under Order 14 rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012 ("ROC 2012"). One of the claims included damages for the late delivery of the property. The court found that the defendant had not raised any triable issues. This is because the Amended Defence indicated there was no dispute about the 265-day delay. Despite the defendant's assertion that the SPA neither prohibits nor bars the plaintiff from claiming damages against it, the defendant was willing to compensate the plaintiff on proof of loss. In light of this, the defendant's liability was justifiable.

Judges (1)

Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan Delivered

Parties (2)

VENUS ASSETS Sdn Bhd Defendant Lim Chee Meng Plaintiff

Case Significance

LIM CHEE MENG v VENUS ASSETS SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 8, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-105-02-2021). The case was decided by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan.

What was the outcome of LIM CHEE MENG v VENUS ASSETS SDN BHD?

LIM CHEE MENG v VENUS ASSETS SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated April 8, 2025. The case was heard by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan. See the full judgment for details.