MIMS CAREER SDN BHD v 1. ) ARMAND MIKHAYL YEOH ABDULLAH 2. ) SHARINA BINTI MOHAMED SULTAN 3. ) MARY ELIZABETH A/P S. SANDANASAMY 4. ) AL-JEFFRY AZRAYL BIN ARMAND MIKHAYL YEOH ABDULLAH 5. ) NATASHA SHEREEN BINTI ARMAND MIKHAYL YEOH 6. ) SANTHYA MARIA A/P RAMANADO 7. ) ELIZABETH JESSIE MARY POOLE

wa-22ncc-833-11-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 11 June 2025 • WA-22NCC-833-11/2024

Catchwords

Mareva Injunction - Post-judgment vs Pre-judgment distinction - Asset freeze application disguised as pre-judgment but in substance seeking enforcement of existing arbitral award - Procedural impropriety - Risk of dissipation - Material delay undermining urgency - Asset transfers 3-6 years before application - Knowledge during JDS proceedings yet 2-year delay - Balance of convenience - Multiplicity of proceedings - Abuse of process - Passive recipient defendant - Disproportionate consequences - Constructive trust as enforcement mechanism - Good arguable case satisfied but risk of dissipation failed

Practice Areas

Mareva Injunction

Judges (1)

Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya Delivered

Parties (8)

MIMS CAREER Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Al-jeffry Azrayl bin Armand Mikhayl Yeoh Abdullah Defendant Armand Mikhayl Yeoh Abdullah Defendant Elizabeth Jessie Mary Poole Defendant Mary Elizabeth a/p S. Sandanasamy Defendant Natasha Shereen binti Armand Mikhayl Yeoh Defendant Santhya Maria a/p Ramanado Defendant Sharina binti Mohamed Sultan Defendant

Case Significance

MIMS CAREER SDN BHD v 1. ) ARMAND MIKHAYL YEOH ABDULLAH 2. ) SHARINA BINTI MO... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 11, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncc-833-11-2024). The case was decided by Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya.

What was the outcome of MIMS CAREER SDN BHD v 1. ) ARMAND MIKHAYL YEOH ABDULLAH 2. ) SHARINA BINTI MO...?

MIMS CAREER SDN BHD v 1. ) ARMAND MIKHAYL YEOH ABDULLAH 2. ) SHARINA BINTI MO... is a High Court decision dated June 11, 2025. The case was heard by Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya. See the full judgment for details.