KENANGA INVESTORS BERHAD v 1. ) GRAND DEAL VISION SDN BHD 2. ) MUSTAKIM BIN MAT NUN 3. ) SARAH AZREEN BINTI ABDUL SAMAT

wa-22ncc-664-09-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 30 May 2024 • WA-22NCC-664-09/2023 • 20 min read

2 cases cited (0 SG, 2 foreign)

Outcome

As such, the Summary Judgment Application is allowed, with costs.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-22ncc-664-09-2023). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Summary judgment - Triable issues - Whether the put option notice was validly issued - Whether the 2nd and 3rd defendants have been discharged from their obligations - Whether the letter of demand was properly served on the 2nd and 3rd defendants

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Adlin binti Abdul Majid Delivered

Counsel (5)

Rashid Zulkifli Firm Shaikh David & Co Firm Abdul Rashid Ismail Counsel Defendant Shaikh Abdul Saleem Shaikh Abdul Karim Counsel Plaintiff Teoh Jo Vi Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

GRAND DEAL VISION Sdn Bhd Defendant KENANGA INVESTORS BERHAD Plaintiff Mustakim bin Mat Nun Defendant Sarah Azreen binti Abdul Samat Defendant

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (2)

MY (2)

[1984] 2 MLJ 300 [2005] 6 MLJ 625

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncc-664-09-2023)