1. ) BLJ Commercials Pte Ltd 2. ) Chen Boon Leong v 1. ) Suntruck Sdn Bhd 2. ) Chen Boon Koh 3. ) Chen Boon Keng

wa-22ncc-632-09-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 11 March 2025 • WA-22NCC-632-09/2024 • 3 min read

Outcome

After hearing submissions from counsel, I dismissed the Defendants’ application for a stay of execution with costs.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-22ncc-632-09-2024). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Order 24 Rule 12 and 13, Order 92 Rule 4 Rules of Court 2012 – Application for production of “the Promissory Notes” - Defendants’ contended that the promissory notes were forged documents - Signing of the notes by the Defendants were not raised prior to the Summary Judgment being allowed - Whether Defendants’ Application were permitted in law – Corrective Affidavits & Amendment of pleadings are factually inconsistent and unsustainable - Application dismissed, the Court was functus officio – the issue of the authenticity was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Ong Chee Kwan Delivered

Counsel (5)

Christopher Lee & Ong Firm Ng Kian Nam & Partners Firm Ashrvini Nair Counsel Plaintiff Fong Lee Wee Counsel Defendant John Rolan Fernandez Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (5)

BLJ Commercials Pte Ltd Plaintiff Suntruck Sdn Bhd Defendant Chen Boon Keng Defendant Chen Boon Koh Defendant Chen Boon Leong Plaintiff

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncc-632-09-2024)