SYED GAMAL BIN SYED KECHIK AL-BUKHARY v 1. ) ACE CREDIT (M) SDN BHD 2. ) CHANG AI NEE 3. ) CHOONG CHEE MENG

wa-22ncc-62-02-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 3 March 2025 • WA-22NCC-62-02/2023 • 5 min read

Catchwords

Order 45 Rule 6(2) and Order 42 Rule 6(2) Rules of Court 2012 – Application for a time to be fixed for the payment of judgment sums – Plaintiff has not taken out any recovery action to enforce the Judgment against the Defendants – Whether Plaintiff’s action constitutes committal proceedings against the Defendants – Plaintiff was merely asking the Court to fix time to enforce the monetary Judgment – Application allowed with costs only to Second and Third Defendants - The Plaintiff to file Proof of Debts with the Liquidators and to await the liquidation of the First Defendant whom has been wound up.

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Ong Chee Kwan Delivered

Counsel (8)

Peter Ling & Van Geyzel Firm Shankar Govinth Firm Wan Marican Hamah & Shaik Firm Lim Chun Yen Counsel Defendant Loo Man Keith Counsel Defendant Nabilah Arysa Counsel Defendant Shanker Govinth Counsel Defendant Wan Zafran Pawancheek Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

ACE CREDIT Sdn Bhd Defendant Chang Ai Nee Defendant Choong Chee Meng Defendant Syed Gamal bin Syed Kechik Al-bukhary Plaintiff

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncc-62-02-2023)