1. ) BEVERLY DENTISTREE SDN BHD 2. ) NATASHA BEVERLY DENTAL SDN BHD v ARLENA PHILIP LEE PIHAK TERKILAN 1. ) BEVERLY DENTISTREE SDN BHD 2. ) NATASHA BEVERLY DENTAL SDN BHD 3. ) NATASHA BEVERLY SDN BHD 4. ) Francis Ng Tian Sang 5. ) Howard Ng How Er 6. ) Alexander Ng Zhonglie

wa-22ncc-286-05-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 11 February 2026 • WA-22NCC-286-05/2025 • 19 min read
13 cases cited (0 SG, 13 foreign)

Outcome

For the reasons above, I dismissed D application in Enclosure 25. I awarded costs of RM 3,000 to the Plaintiffs.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-22ncc-286-05-2025). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Amendment to pleadings – Whether the amendments are procedurally valid under Order 20 rule 3 of the Rules of Court 2012 – Whether the amendments were filed before the close of pleadings – Whether the amendments amount to a recantation of an admission of fact – Whether the amendments alter the nature and character of the action

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Quay Chew Soon Delivered

Counsel (4)

A.J Ariffin, Yeo & Harpal Firm Lo Chambers Firm Chan Yi Zheng Counsel Defendant Ivanpal Grewal Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (9)

BEVERLY DENTISTREE Sdn Bhd Aggrieved Party BEVERLY DENTISTREE Sdn Bhd Plaintiff NATASHA BEVERLY DENTAL Sdn Bhd Aggrieved Party NATASHA BEVERLY DENTAL Sdn Bhd Plaintiff NATASHA BEVERLY Sdn Bhd Aggrieved Party Alexander Ng Zhonglie Aggrieved Party Arlena Philip Lee Defendant Francis Ng Tian Sang Aggrieved Party Howard Ng How Er Aggrieved Party

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (13)

MY (13)
[1959] 1 MLJ 228 [1981] 2 MLJ 10 [1983] 1 MLJ 213 [1987] 1 MLJ 230 [1997] 1 MLJ 629 [2004] 2 MLJ 145 [2004] 4 MLJ 398 [2011] 6 MLJ 228 [2012] 6 MLJ 551 [2015] 6 MLJ 1 [2015] 6 MLJ 556 [2016] MLJU 416 [2023] MLJU 2163

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncc-286-05-2025)