Semenyih Jaya Sdn. Bhd. v 1. ) LAU KOK LOON @ LAU SAY SIOK 2. ) Lau Tein Khang
21 cases cited
(1 SG, 20 foreign)
Outcome
“ (own emphasis added) [67] For the reasons set out above, I allowed the Plaintiff's claim, specifically: i) A declaration that the payments made by the Plaintiff to the 1st Defendant, totalling RM10,608,167.43, are null and void; ii) An order that the 1st Defendant return the sum of RM10,608,167.43; iii) A declaration that the Defendants have breached their fiduciary duties owed to the Plaintiff; iv) Pre and Post-Judgment interests; and.
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Statutes Cited
Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
Cases Cited (21)
SLR (1)
[2007] 4 SLR(R) 513
UK (10)
[1897] AC 22 [1925] AC 619 [1925] All ER 51 [1951] Ch 286 [1969] 2 Ch 365 [1998] Ch 1 [1999] Ch 253 [2007] EWHC 1245 [2021] AC 122 [2021] UKPC 4
MY (10)
[2005] 3 CLJ 355 [2005] MLJU 225 [2008] 5 MLJ 469 [2012] 3 MLJ 616 [2012] 5 CLJ 169 [2015] 6 MLJ 1 [2016] MLJU 1488 [2018] 2 MLJ 177 [2019] 3 MLJ 510 [2021] 4 MLJ 323
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-22ncc-211-05-2020)