Prismaworld Embassyview Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Tanah Bayumas Sdn Bhd 2. ) Adam Primus Varghese Bin Abdullah Daripada Adamprimus & Co, Plt (Sebagai Penerima Dan Pengurus Prismaworld Embassyview Sdn Bhd) Macpherson Simon Daripada Adamprimus & Co, Plt (Sebagai Penerima Dan Pengurus Prismaworld Embassyview Sdn Bhd) 830308136071 3. ) RHB Bank Berhad
Catchwords
Civil Procedure — Striking out — Application by all defendants to strike out writ and statement of claim — Whether claim plain and obviously unsustainable — Whether issues require determination at full trial — Test under O 18 r 19 Rules of Court 2012 — Court declining to summarily dismiss claim — Rules of Court 2012, O 18 r 19 Insolvency — Receivers and Managers — Sale of property by receivers during pending judicial management application — Validity of Sale and Purchase Agreement — Whether SPA enforceable — Whether plaintiff has locus standi to challenge SPA — Whether breach of section 410 Companies Act 2016 — Whether misconduct by receivers or chargee bank — Companies Act 2016, s. 410 Company Law — Agency of Receivers and Managers — Whether acts of receivers attributable to chargee bank — Allegation of conspiracy to force sale at undervalue — Whether plaintiff wrongfully deprived of right to redeem property — Need for factual determination at trial Remedies — Injunction previously refused as damages adequate — Whether claim nevertheless discloses reasonable cause of action — Court allowing claim to proceed to trial notwithstanding refusal of interim relief
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Case Significance
Prismaworld Embassyview Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Tanah Bayumas Sdn Bhd 2. ) Adam Primus... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 21, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncc-142-03-2025). The case was decided by Mohd Arief Emran bin Arifin.
What was the outcome of Prismaworld Embassyview Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Tanah Bayumas Sdn Bhd 2. ) Adam Primus...?
Prismaworld Embassyview Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Tanah Bayumas Sdn Bhd 2. ) Adam Primus... is a High Court decision dated September 21, 2025. The case was heard by Mohd Arief Emran bin Arifin. See the full judgment for details.