1. ) MAXI WONDER SDN BHD 2. ) FONG SAU YING 3. ) DATO' PANG YEE TECK 4. ) TAN HUI KANG 5. ) ONG AH CHOO v DCS TRADING SDN BHD

wa-22ncc-110-02-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 25 March 2025 • WA-22NCC-110-02/2024 • 18 min read

16 cases cited (2 SG, 14 foreign)

Outcome

For the aforesaid reasons, I dismissed the application in Enclosure 109.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-22ncc-110-02-2024). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Civil Procedure - Mareva Injunction - Whether there is a good arguable case - Whether the Plaintiff has assets within Jurisdiction - Whether there is a real risk that the Plaintiffs’ assets will be dissipated or moved before judgment could be satisfied - the Defendant has no claim to be enforced against the Plaintiff - The Defendant itself is impecunious

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Mohd Arief Emran bin Arifin Delivered

Counsel (8)

Arthur Wang, Lian & Associates Firm Cecil Abraham & Partners Firm Arthur Wang Ming Way Counsel Defendant Mohd Irwan Ismail Counsel Plaintiff Nurufarhina Ab Rahim Counsel Defendant Rishwant Singh Counsel Plaintiff Siow Young Kei Counsel Defendant Yap Jing Wen Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (6)

DCS TRADING Sdn Bhd Defendant MAXI WONDER Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Dato' Pang Yee Teck Plaintiff Fong Sau Ying Plaintiff Ong Ah Choo Plaintiff Tan Hui Kang Plaintiff

Cases Cited (16)

SG (1)

[2015] SGCA 45

SLR (1)

[2015] 5 SLR 558

UK (5)

[1980] 1 All ER 213 [1981] 2 All ER 577 [1983] 2 All ER 158 [1984] 1 All ER 398 [2019] EWCA Civ 2203

MY (8)

[1982] 1 MLJ 260 [1985] 1 MLJ 62 [1987] 2 CLJ 377 [1988] 1 MLJ 97 [1995] 2 CLJ 893 [2022] 1 MLJ 316 [2022] 5 CLJ 949 [2022] 7 CLJ 505

HK (1)

[2020] HKCA 537

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncc-110-02-2024)