1. ) MK1 DEVELOPMENT (3) SDN. BHD. 2. ) GT-MAX CONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD. v 1. ) PUBLIC BANK BERHAD 2. ) PUBLIC ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD
Catchwords
Civil Procedure — Summary judgment — Determination of question of law or construction of document — Determination of breach of statutory duty — Whether issue of whether the defendant had breached the statutory duty was a question of fact, or question of law or construction — Ambit of O 14A — Rules of Court 2012. O.14A — Land Development Act 1956. s.3(1) — Bills of Exchange Act 1949, s.85 — Financial Services Act 2013, s.48 — Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 — Malaysia Anti-Corruption Corporation Act 2009, s.17A — Money Services Business Act 2011, s.36 & s.74 — Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001, s.16A. Civil Procedure — Discovery — Inspection of documents — Whether order for production justified — Whether necessary for disposing matter fairly or for saving costs — Whether merely fishing for evidence — Whether order would be unduly oppressive — Whether documents in possession, custody and power of opponent — Rules of Court 2012, O 24 r 3, r5, r12, r 13, — Courts of Judicature Act 1964, s 25(2) & Paragraph 14 of the Schedule.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-22m-45-01-2025)