KEHZEN ENGINEERING SDN BHD v SETIA PRECAST SDN BHD

wa-22c-90-12-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 25 September 2025 • WA-22C-90-12/2023

Catchwords

Enclosure 345. Administration of Justice & Civil Procedure: Whether the recusal application can be made under Order 57 Rule 1 of ROC 2012 for transfer of proceeding to another construction court - Correct test to be applied for recusal of judges- Whether the Affidavit discloses grounds evidencing "real danger of bias" test- Whether Judicial Commissioner ought to recuse himself from hearing present matter on the basis of professional association with party’s counsel

Practice Areas

Enclosure 345. Administration of Justice & Civil Procedure: Whether the recusal application can be made under Order 57 Rule 1 of ROC 2012 for transfer of proceeding to another construction court

Judges (1)

Rajes Raghavji Delivered

Parties (2)

KEHZEN ENGINEERING Sdn Bhd Plaintiff SETIA PRECAST Sdn Bhd Defendant

Case Significance

KEHZEN ENGINEERING SDN BHD v SETIA PRECAST SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 25, 2025 (citation: wa-22c-90-12-2023). The case was decided by Rajes Raghavji.

What was the outcome of KEHZEN ENGINEERING SDN BHD v SETIA PRECAST SDN BHD?

KEHZEN ENGINEERING SDN BHD v SETIA PRECAST SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated September 25, 2025. The case was heard by Rajes Raghavji. See the full judgment for details.