PLUS THREE CONSULTANTS (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD. v 1. ) LANDASAN KAPITAL (M) SDN. BHD. 2. ) LIM CZE MIEN (Pemilik Tunggal beramal di bawah nama dan gaya Tetuan Cze Mien & Co)

wa-22c-78-10-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 13 January 2025 • WA-22C-78-10/2021

Catchwords

Enclosure 1. In the matter, the Plaintiff who are known as Plus Three Consultants (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. (“P3”) were engaged by Landasan Kapital (M) Sdn. Bhd (“LKSB”) to carry out consultancy work in respect of arbitration proceedings. P3 had allegedly presented LKSB with monthly invoices and timesheets that P3 claims were never challenged by LKSB. However, despite this, P3 claims that LKSB have refused to settle the outstanding invoices. [3] LKSB in their Defence and Counterclaim, contended that they are not obliged to settle the outstanding debt of RM1,880,378.42 and they are claiming for the return of RM1,089,531.18 in paid invoices, as well as aggravated, exemplary and/ or punitive damages. [5] There is also a counter claim by LKSB against D2, for, inter alia, breach of duties and/or fiduciary duties and/or contractual obligations of good faith. D2 then filed a counterclaim against LKSB, for the non-payment of work performed by D2.

Practice Areas

Enclosure 1. In the matter, the Plaintiff who are known as Plus Three Consultants (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. (“P3”) were engaged by Landasan Kapital (M) Sdn. Bhd (“LKSB”) to carry out consultancy work in respect of arbitration proceedings. P3 had allegedly presented LKSB with monthly invoices and timesheets that P3 claims were never challenged by LKSB. However, despite this, P3 claims that LKSB have refused to settle the outstanding invoices. 3 LKSB in their Defence and Counterclaim, contended that they are not obliged to settle the outstanding debt of RM1,880,378.42 and they are claiming for the return of RM1,089,531.18 in paid invoices, as well as aggravated, exemplary and/ or punitive damages. 5 There is also a counter claim by LKSB against D2, for, inter alia, breach of duties and/or fiduciary duties and/or contractual obligations of good faith. D2 then filed a counterclaim against LKSB, for the non-payment of work performed by D2.

Judges (1)

Nadzarin bin Wok Nordin Delivered

Parties (3)

LANDASAN KAPITAL Sdn Bhd Defendant PLUS THREE CONSULTANTS Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Lim Cze Mien Defendant

Case Significance

PLUS THREE CONSULTANTS (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD. v 1. ) LANDASAN KAPITAL (M) SDN. ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 13, 2025 (citation: wa-22c-78-10-2021). The case was decided by Nadzarin bin Wok Nordin.

What was the outcome of PLUS THREE CONSULTANTS (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD. v 1. ) LANDASAN KAPITAL (M) SDN. ...?

PLUS THREE CONSULTANTS (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD. v 1. ) LANDASAN KAPITAL (M) SDN. ... is a High Court decision dated January 13, 2025. The case was heard by Nadzarin bin Wok Nordin. See the full judgment for details.