HIGH POINT FURNISHING SDN BHD v PRESIDENT HOTEL SDN BHD

wa-22c-36-04-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 20 April 2025 • WA-22C-36-04/2024 • 8 min read
5 cases cited (0 SG, 5 foreign)

Outcome

Accordingly, I hold that the cause of action against D2 is an abuse of process as well as being scandalous, frivolous and vexatious and I hereby allowed prayer 1 and for prayer 2 costs of RM5,500.00 under Enclosure 29.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (wa-22c-36-04-2024). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Enclosure 1 & 29. The 2nd Defendant, Pena Builders Sdn. Bhd. (“D2”) had applied under enclosure 29 (Enclosure 29) for inter alia an Order pursuant to Order 18 rule 19 (1) (a), (b) and/or (d) to dismiss High Point Furnishing Sdn. Bhd. (“Plaintiff”) Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim against it under this Suit.

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Nadzarin bin Wok Nordin Delivered

Counsel (4)

Gurmit Sodhi Chambers Firm YY Chin & Co. Firm Kai Chi Theng Counsel Plaintiff Yeoh Leng Yang Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

HIGH POINT FURNISHING Sdn Bhd Plaintiff PRESIDENT HOTEL Sdn Bhd Defendant

Statutes Cited

Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)
s 71

Cases Cited (5)

MY (5)
[1967] 2 MLJ 118 [2010] 3 MLJ 721 [2010] 5 CLJ 745 [2010] MLJU 42 [2018] 5 MLJ 397

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22c-36-04-2024)