YAP TEAK SING v LAI MING CHUN @ LAI POH LIN
Catchwords
Introduction 1. The learned Magistrate had allowed the application of the Defendant to set aside the ex parte leave for a committal proceeding applied for by the Plaintiff against the 1st Defendant. 2. In deciding that the 1st Defendant had successfully set aside the ex parte application for leave for the committal proceeding the learned Magistrate decided Plaintiff’s application for a committal proceeding was therefore rendered academic. 3. The Plaintiff now appeals against both this decision of the learned Magistrate. Conclusion 19. In the upshot the Court dismissed both the appeals by the Plaintiff against the learned Magistrate’s decision with a cost of RM3,000.
Practice Areas
Introduction 1. The learned Magistrate had allowed the application of the Defendant to set aside the ex parte leave for a committal proceeding applied for by the Plaintiff against the 1st Defendant. 2. In deciding that the 1st Defendant had successfully set aside the ex parte application for leave for the committal proceeding the learned Magistrate decided Plaintiff’s application for a committal proceeding was therefore rendered academic. 3. The Plaintiff now appeals against both this decision of the learned Magistrate. Conclusion 19. In the upshot the Court dismissed both the appeals by the Plaintiff against the learned Magistrate’s decision with a cost of RM3,000.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
YAP TEAK SING v LAI MING CHUN @ LAI POH LIN is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated February 20, 2025 (citation: wa-11ancvc-57-09-2024). The case was decided by Akhtar bin Tahir.
Key issues: Introduction.
What was the outcome of YAP TEAK SING v LAI MING CHUN @ LAI POH LIN?
YAP TEAK SING v LAI MING CHUN @ LAI POH LIN is a High Court decision dated February 20, 2025. The case was heard by Akhtar bin Tahir. See the full judgment for details.