MAGENDRAN A/L MUKUNTHAN v Pendakwa Raya [Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara]
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (3)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
MAGENDRAN A/L MUKUNTHAN v Pendakwa Raya [Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabata... is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated March 26, 2025 (citation: w-05sh-91-02-2024). <p>The appellant was convicted of three drug charges including trafficking 191.1g of methamphetamine at Taman Mastiara, KL, and sentenced to 30 years' imprisonment with 12 strokes. The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence, finding the appellant had possession and knowledge of the drugs, his defence was not credible, and the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.</p> The panel comprised Azmi bin Ariffin, Che Mohd Ruzima bin Ghazali and Mohamed Zaini bin Mazlan, with Azmi bin Ariffin delivering the judgment. Counsel appearing: Datuk N. Sivananthan (counsel for appellant), Nabila Habib (counsel for appellant), Noorhisham Bin Mohd Jaafar (prosecution counsel).
Summary
The appellant was convicted of three drug charges including trafficking 191.1g of methamphetamine at Taman Mastiara, KL, and sentenced to 30 years' imprisonment with 12 strokes. The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence, finding the appellant had possession and knowledge of the drugs, his defence was not credible, and the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
What was the outcome of MAGENDRAN A/L MUKUNTHAN v Pendakwa Raya [Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabata...?
<p>The appellant was convicted of three drug charges including trafficking 191.1g of methamphetamine at Taman Mastiara, KL, and sentenced to 30 years'...