1. ) AHMAD FAIZAL BIN MOHAMAD ALI 2. ) NORMALA BINTI HAJI BASIRON 3. ) Kerajaan Malaysia v JAY SHREE L. C. DOSHI (secara sendiri dan sebagai Wasi dan Pemegang Amanah Estet Vinayak Prabhakar Pradhan)
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (8)
Case Significance
1. ) AHMAD FAIZAL BIN MOHAMAD ALI 2. ) NORMALA BINTI HAJI BASIRON 3. ) Keraja... is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated January 29, 2026 (citation: w-01ncvcw-440-07-2024). <p>This medical negligence appeal arose from a Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) procedure that departed from the multidisciplinary tumour board's recommendation for cryoablation, causing a severe burn injury to the deceased patient. The Court of Appeal largely affirmed the High Court's award of RM1.55 million in damages, reducing special damages for Singapore treatment to one-third of the claimed amount but upholding RM800,000 in general damages and RM500,000 in aggravated damages for the doctor's The panel comprised Mohd Radzi bin Harun, Shahnaz binti Sulaiman and Supang Lian, with Shahnaz binti Sulaiman delivering the judgment.
Summary
This medical negligence appeal arose from a Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) procedure that departed from the multidisciplinary tumour board's recommendation for cryoablation, causing a severe burn injury to the deceased patient. The Court of Appeal largely affirmed the High Court's award of RM1.55 million in damages, reducing special damages for Singapore treatment to one-third of the claimed amount but upholding RM800,000 in general damages and RM500,000 in aggravated damages for the doctor's lack of informed consent, negligent execution, and callous post-operative attitude.
What was the outcome of 1. ) AHMAD FAIZAL BIN MOHAMAD ALI 2. ) NORMALA BINTI HAJI BASIRON 3. ) Keraja...?
<p>This medical negligence appeal arose from a Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) procedure that departed from the multidisciplinary tumour board's recomme...