1. ) AHMAD FAIZAL BIN MOHAMAD ALI 2. ) NORMALA BINTI HAJI BASIRON 3. ) Kerajaan Malaysia v JAY SHREE L. C. DOSHI (secara sendiri dan sebagai Wasi dan Pemegang Amanah Estet Vinayak Prabhakar Pradhan)

w-01ncvcw-440-07-2024 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 29 January 2026 • W-01(NCvC)(W)-440-07/2024 • 49 min read
27 cases cited (1 SG, 26 foreign)

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (8)

Parties (4)

Case Significance

1. ) AHMAD FAIZAL BIN MOHAMAD ALI 2. ) NORMALA BINTI HAJI BASIRON 3. ) Keraja... is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated January 29, 2026 (citation: w-01ncvcw-440-07-2024). <p>This medical negligence appeal arose from a Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) procedure that departed from the multidisciplinary tumour board's recommendation for cryoablation, causing a severe burn injury to the deceased patient. The Court of Appeal largely affirmed the High Court's award of RM1.55 million in damages, reducing special damages for Singapore treatment to one-third of the claimed amount but upholding RM800,000 in general damages and RM500,000 in aggravated damages for the doctor's The panel comprised Mohd Radzi bin Harun, Shahnaz binti Sulaiman and Supang Lian, with Shahnaz binti Sulaiman delivering the judgment.

Summary

This medical negligence appeal arose from a Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) procedure that departed from the multidisciplinary tumour board's recommendation for cryoablation, causing a severe burn injury to the deceased patient. The Court of Appeal largely affirmed the High Court's award of RM1.55 million in damages, reducing special damages for Singapore treatment to one-third of the claimed amount but upholding RM800,000 in general damages and RM500,000 in aggravated damages for the doctor's lack of informed consent, negligent execution, and callous post-operative attitude.

What was the outcome of 1. ) AHMAD FAIZAL BIN MOHAMAD ALI 2. ) NORMALA BINTI HAJI BASIRON 3. ) Keraja...?

<p>This medical negligence appeal arose from a Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) procedure that departed from the multidisciplinary tumour board's recomme...

Cases Cited (27)

SLR (1)
[2012] 4 SLR 129
UK (6)
[1964] 1 All ER 367 [1964] 2 WLR 269 [1964] AC 1129 [1997] 2 All ER 762 [1997] 2 All ER 782 [2004] EWCA Civ 1127
MY (20)
[1981] 1 MLJ 292 [1997] 2 MLJ 208 [2004] 2 MLJ 465 [2006] 1 MLJ 675 [2006] 4 MLJ 555 [2007] 1 CLJ 229 [2016] 4 MLJ 282 [2016] 6 CLJ 346 [2016] MLJU 1175 [2016] MLJU 1899 [2017] 7 AMR 560 [2017] 8 CLJ 605 [2018] 1 MLJ 784 [2019] 8 MLJ 331 [2019] 9 CLJ 246 [2020] 9 MLJ 409 [2023] MLJU 1014 [2025] AMEJ 1196 [2025] MLJU 2274 [2025] MLJU 922