Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v GENTING MALAYSIA BERHAD

w-01a-449-08-2021 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 28 April 2024 • W-01(A)-449-08/2021 • 34 min read
21 cases cited (0 SG, 21 foreign)

Outcome

For the reasons enumerated above, we allow the appeal with costs and set aside the decision of the learned Judge against the DGIR.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) (w-01a-449-08-2021). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (8)

Parties (2)

Statutes Cited

Federal Constitution
Art 5(1)

Cases Cited (21)

UK (2)
[1984] 3 All ER 935 [1985] AC 461
MY (19)
[1983] 2 CLJ 7 [1983] 2 MLJ 54 [1984] 1 MLJ 168 [1999] 3 CLJ 65 [2005] 8 CLJ 705 [2008] 6 CLJ 473 [2008] 6 CLJ 805 [2009] 5 CLJ 153 [2009] 5 CLJ 698 [2010] 4 MLJ 360 [2010] 5 CLJ 123 [2011] 6 MLJ 490 [2012] 1 CLJ 805 [2013] 4 CLJ 193 [2015] 3 CLJ 861 [2017] 2 MLJ 197 [2017] 5 CLJ 283 [2018] MLJU 218 [2020] 3 CLJ 153

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (w-01a-449-08-2021)