Hubline Berhad v 1. ) INTAN WAZLIN BINTI AB WAHAB & 38 YANG LAIN 2. ) MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA 3. ) Highline Shipping Sdn Bhd
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (3)
Counsel (10)
Case Significance
Hubline Berhad v 1. ) INTAN WAZLIN BINTI AB WAHAB & 38 YANG LAIN 2. ) MAHKAMA... is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated October 20, 2025 (citation: w-01a-128-03-2021). <p>Hubline Berhad challenged the Industrial Court's joinder of it as a party to unfair dismissal proceedings brought by 39 former employees of its subsidiary Hub Shipping Sdn Bhd, which had since gone into insolvency. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, quashing the joinder order and upholding the Salomon principle of separate legal personality, finding that s.29(a) of the Industrial Relations Act does not permit joining a non-employer affiliate entity.</p> The panel comprised Lim Chong Fong, Noorin binti Badaruddin and S. Nantha Balan a/l E.s. Moorthy, with S. Nantha Balan a/l E.s. Moorthy delivering the judgment.
Key issues: Judicial Review - dismissal without just cause or excuse - representations were referred to the Industrial Court pursuant to s.20(3) of the Act. ..
Summary
Hubline Berhad challenged the Industrial Court's joinder of it as a party to unfair dismissal proceedings brought by 39 former employees of its subsidiary Hub Shipping Sdn Bhd, which had since gone into insolvency. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, quashing the joinder order and upholding the Salomon principle of separate legal personality, finding that s.29(a) of the Industrial Relations Act does not permit joining a non-employer affiliate entity.
What was the outcome of Hubline Berhad v 1. ) INTAN WAZLIN BINTI AB WAHAB & 38 YANG LAIN 2. ) MAHKAMA...?
<p>Hubline Berhad challenged the Industrial Court's joinder of it as a party to unfair dismissal proceedings brought by 39 former employees of its sub...