Hubline Berhad v 1. ) INTAN WAZLIN BINTI AB WAHAB & 38 YANG LAIN 2. ) MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA 3. ) Highline Shipping Sdn Bhd

w-01a-128-03-2021 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 20 October 2025 • W-01(A)-128-03/2021 • 71 min read
40 cases cited (0 SG, 40 foreign)

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (10)

Parties (4)

Case Significance

Hubline Berhad v 1. ) INTAN WAZLIN BINTI AB WAHAB & 38 YANG LAIN 2. ) MAHKAMA... is a Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) decision dated October 20, 2025 (citation: w-01a-128-03-2021). <p>Hubline Berhad challenged the Industrial Court's joinder of it as a party to unfair dismissal proceedings brought by 39 former employees of its subsidiary Hub Shipping Sdn Bhd, which had since gone into insolvency. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, quashing the joinder order and upholding the Salomon principle of separate legal personality, finding that s.29(a) of the Industrial Relations Act does not permit joining a non-employer affiliate entity.</p> The panel comprised Lim Chong Fong, Noorin binti Badaruddin and S. Nantha Balan a/l E.s. Moorthy, with S. Nantha Balan a/l E.s. Moorthy delivering the judgment.

Key issues: Judicial Review - dismissal without just cause or excuse - representations were referred to the Industrial Court pursuant to s.20(3) of the Act. ..

Summary

Hubline Berhad challenged the Industrial Court's joinder of it as a party to unfair dismissal proceedings brought by 39 former employees of its subsidiary Hub Shipping Sdn Bhd, which had since gone into insolvency. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, quashing the joinder order and upholding the Salomon principle of separate legal personality, finding that s.29(a) of the Industrial Relations Act does not permit joining a non-employer affiliate entity.

What was the outcome of Hubline Berhad v 1. ) INTAN WAZLIN BINTI AB WAHAB & 38 YANG LAIN 2. ) MAHKAMA...?

<p>Hubline Berhad challenged the Industrial Court's joinder of it as a party to unfair dismissal proceedings brought by 39 former employees of its sub...

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (40)

UK (14)
[1897] AC 22 [1937] 2 All ER 227 [1937] 4 All ER 101 [1938] 4 All ER 115 [1938] 4 All ER 116 [1951] 2 KB 366 [1955] 1 All ER 725 [1955] 1 WLR 483 [1957] 1 WLR 464 [1962] 2 QB 173 [2007] EWHC 99 [2008] EWHC 2380 [2013] 2 AC 415 [2013] UKSC 34
MY (25)
[1980] 1 MLJ 109 [1981] 1 MLJ 304 [1983] 2 MLJ 49 [1986] 1 MLJ 382 [1988] 3 MLJ 332 [1995] 1 AMR 622 [1995] 1 MLJ 281 [1995] 2 MLJ 317 [1996] 4 CLJ 747 [2000] 1 CLJ 503 [2003] 4 MLRH 352 [2004] 1 CLJ 849 [2004] 1 MLJ 626 [2004] 2 AMR 104 [2005] 3 CLJ 355 [2005] 4 AMR 525 [2005] MLJU 225 [2014] 3 MLJ 785 [2015] 3 AMR 197 [2015] 3 CLJ 1053 [2015] 4 MLJ 613 [2020] 5 MLJ 58 [2021] 3 MLJ 622 [2022] AMEJ 0032 [2022] MLJU 80
IN (1)
AIR 1950 SC 304