1. ) PERIANG A/L ENDIN NIANG @ PHIANG 2. ) DIN NAM A/L DIN KEOW 3. ) EDING A/L E SIM 4. ) AL PIN A/L MATONG 5. ) AIKHIM A/L ENTANG v Tan Ah Huat (sued as the public officer of Malaysian Buddhist Meditation Centre)

pa-24ncvc-1391-11-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 6 April 2025 • PA-24NCvC-1391-11/2024

Catchwords

Claim for possession of land – Whether originating summons appropriate mode – Whether substantial dispute of fact – Whether the defendant is a bare licensee – Whether the defendant has rights over the land on a trust to operate a meditation centre and to carry on religious activities.

Practice Areas

Claim for possession of land

Judges (1)

Quay Chew Soon Delivered

Parties (6)

Aikhim a/l Entang Applicant Al Pin a/l Matong Applicant Din Nam a/l Din Keow Applicant Eding a/l E Sim Applicant Periang a/l Endin Niang @ Phiang Applicant Tan Ah Huat Respondent

Case Significance

1. ) PERIANG A/L ENDIN NIANG @ PHIANG 2. ) DIN NAM A/L DIN KEOW 3. ) EDING A/... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 6, 2025 (citation: pa-24ncvc-1391-11-2024). The case was decided by Quay Chew Soon.

What was the outcome of 1. ) PERIANG A/L ENDIN NIANG @ PHIANG 2. ) DIN NAM A/L DIN KEOW 3. ) EDING A/...?

1. ) PERIANG A/L ENDIN NIANG @ PHIANG 2. ) DIN NAM A/L DIN KEOW 3. ) EDING A/... is a High Court decision dated April 6, 2025. The case was heard by Quay Chew Soon. See the full judgment for details.