XXXX v XXXX

p-02imncvc-2334-12-2021 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 28 November 2024 • P-02(IM)(NCvC)-2334-12/2021 • 15 min read

Outcome

Therefore, we find no merit in both the Appeals and therefore we dismissed both the appeal with cost of RM10,000.00 for each appeal subject to allocator.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) (p-02imncvc-2334-12-2021). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

bekas rakan kongsi pentadbir harta pusaka Order 18 rule 19 of the Rules of Court 2012 strike out Plaintiffs’ Writ and Statement of Claim Dissatisfied stake holders monies pleaded facts Joint Venture Agreement Dynasty Palace Sdn Bhd represented own lawyers conspired commit fraud deceit breach of trust breach of duty misappropriation denied disputed allegation applications dismissed applications claim/suit disclose no sustainable reasonable cause of action frivolous scandalous vexatious abuse of the court process serious issues to be tried same facts cause of action reliefs reventilate inhibited res judicata estoppel approbated reprobated double recovery unjust enrichment tainted mala fide erroneous multiplicity action professional negligence dishonesty misconduct burden distinct substantively different retransferring land exemplary damages merit dismissed Appeals allocator

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure Damages Equity & Trusts Probate & Administration

Judges (3)

Ahmad Zaidi bin Ibrahim Delivered Faizah binti Jamaludin Coram Hashim bin Hamzah Coram

Counsel (4)

Ismail Khoo & Associates Firm Ong and Manecksha Firm Jimmy Gay Choom Hee Counsel Respondent Lee Kok Hao Counsel Appellant

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (p-02imncvc-2334-12-2021)