PRAGASH A/L SAVARIMUTHU v KAVITA A/P NADARAJAN
Catchwords
1. Application under O.42 r.13 / O.92 r.4 to set aside ex parte order (14.05.2025). 2. Ex parte leave to enforce Sessions Court judgment via Prohibitory Order (O.47 r.6; ss.5, 324, 334 NLC). 3. Judgment not properly served; service on former solicitors invalid. 4. No personal/AR service; affidavit of service unreliable. 5. Prohibitory Order registered prematurely before service; no notice to chargee (AmBank). 6. Time under O.42 r.13 not triggered; application filed within time. 7. Sufficient cause shown under O.47 r.6(k). 8. Ex parte order and Prohibitory Order set aside; costs RM8,000.
Practice Areas
1. Application under O.42 r.13 / O.92 r.4 to set aside ex parte order (14.05.2025). 2. Ex parte leave to enforce Sessions Court judgment via Prohibitory Order (O.47 r.6; ss.5, 324, 334 NLC). 3. Judgment not properly served; service on former solicitors invalid. 4. No personal/AR service; affidavit of service unreliable. 5. Prohibitory Order registered prematurely before service; no notice to chargee (AmBank). 6. Time under O.42 r.13 not triggered; application filed within time. 7. Sufficient cause shown under O.47 r.6(k). 8. Ex parte order and Prohibitory Order set aside; costs RM8,000.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
PRAGASH A/L SAVARIMUTHU v KAVITA A/P NADARAJAN is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 29, 2025 (citation: ja-24ncvc-306-03-2025). The case was decided by Noradura binti Hamzah.
Key issues: 1. Application under O.42 r.13 / O.92 r.4 to set aside ex parte order (14.05.2025)..
What was the outcome of PRAGASH A/L SAVARIMUTHU v KAVITA A/P NADARAJAN?
PRAGASH A/L SAVARIMUTHU v KAVITA A/P NADARAJAN is a High Court decision dated October 29, 2025. The case was heard by Noradura binti Hamzah. See the full judgment for details.