1. ) Lau Choon Yeun 2. ) Mak Cheng Wan v 1. ) Mak Chow Yon @ Ha Chai 2. ) Mak Kee Cheong 3. ) Mak How Cheong 4. ) Mak Sit Keng

ja-24ncvc-1391-12-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 26 November 2024 • JA-24NCvC-1391-12/2023 • 13 min read
2 cases cited (0 SG, 2 foreign)

Outcome

Hence, I allow Enclosure 14 with costs in the cause.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ja-24ncvc-1391-12-2023). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Civil procedure - application filed by the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants seeking for, inter alia, an order that this Originating Summons be converted into a writ action - O. 28, r. 8(1) of the ROC vests the Court a discretion to convert an action filed by way of originating summons to a writ action on the basis of disputes of facts and factual discrepancies - incumbent upon the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants to justify that the OS should be continued with a writ action rather than affidavits evidence

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Shamsulbahri bin Haji Ibrahim Delivered

Counsel (7)

Damien Chan, Hannibal & Ng Chambers Firm Raj, Ong & Yudistra Firm Damien Chan Kay Ding Counsel Plaintiff Jeff Ng Qin Liang Counsel Plaintiff Lim Choon Khim Counsel Plaintiff Nurul Hanani binti Azamuddin Counsel Defendant Ong Yu Jian Counsel Defendant

Parties (6)

Lau Choon Yeun Applicant Mak Cheng Wan Applicant Mak Chow Yon @ Ha Chai Respondent Mak How Cheong Respondent Mak Kee Cheong Respondent Mak Sit Keng Respondent

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (2)

MY (2)
[2002] 1 CLJ 420 [2016] 2 CLJ 294

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-24ncvc-1391-12-2023)