M&C PRECISION SDN BHD v PENGANGKUTAN TEY SELATAN SDN BHD PENCELAH MCLEAN PLASTIC ENGINEERING SDN. BHD.

ja-24ncvc-1343-09-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 January 2026 • JA-24NCvC-1343-09/2025 • 11 min read
4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign)

Catchwords

Prosedur Sivil — Pencelahan — Kepentingan undang-undang sebenar dan langsung — Ambang Pegang Mining — Kepentingan derivatif dan tidak langsung — Pencelahan — Kehadiran pihak tidak perlu bagi pelupusan berkesan — isu 2 ssebagai ujian alternative - Risiko komersial yang diambil secara sedar — Pertikaian boleh diputus antara pihak sedia ada — Keadilan Prosedural — Tidak mewujudkan hak substantif baharu — Kes Dirujuk — Pegang Mining Co Ltd v Choong Sam & Ors [1968] 2 MLJ 52; Sri Permata Sdn Bhd v PPH Realty Sdn Bhd [2001] 7 CLJ 633; Chong Fook Sin v Amanah Raya Bhd & Ors [2010] 7 CLJ 917 — Keputusan — Permohonan pencelahan ditolak — Kos RM3,000.00 kepada Plaintif.

Practice Areas

Prosedur Sivil

Judges (1)

Manira binti Mohd Nor Delivered

Counsel (5)

Benjamin Poh Law Office Firm L.X Chiah and Associates Firm Benjamin Poh Counsel Plaintiff Chiah Li Xin Counsel Intervener Fatin Farhana Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (3)

M&C PRECISION Sdn Bhd Applicant MCLEAN PLASTIC ENGINEERING Sdn Bhd Intervener PENGANGKUTAN TEY SELATAN Sdn Bhd Respondent

Case Significance

M&C PRECISION SDN BHD v PENGANGKUTAN TEY SELATAN SDN BHD PENCELAH MCLEAN PLAS... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 18, 2026 (citation: ja-24ncvc-1343-09-2025). <p>M&C Precision, an existing tenant of factory premises, filed suit regarding tenancy renewal rights. McLean Plastic Engineering applied to intervene as a party, claiming it had entered into a new tenancy agreement for the same premises. The court dismissed the intervention application, finding the proposed intervener had no real and direct legal interest, entered the new lease with knowledge of the existing dispute, and its presence was unnecessary for effective disposal of the case between ex The case was decided by Manira binti Mohd Nor. Counsel appearing: Benjamin Poh (counsel for plaintiff), Chiah Li Xin (counsel for intervener), Fatin Farhana (counsel for plaintiff).

Summary

M&C Precision, an existing tenant of factory premises, filed suit regarding tenancy renewal rights. McLean Plastic Engineering applied to intervene as a party, claiming it had entered into a new tenancy agreement for the same premises. The court dismissed the intervention application, finding the proposed intervener had no real and direct legal interest, entered the new lease with knowledge of the existing dispute, and its presence was unnecessary for effective disposal of the case between existing parties.

What was the outcome of M&C PRECISION SDN BHD v PENGANGKUTAN TEY SELATAN SDN BHD PENCELAH MCLEAN PLAS...?

<p>M&C Precision, an existing tenant of factory premises, filed suit regarding tenancy renewal rights. McLean Plastic Engineering applied to intervene...

Cases Cited (4)

MY (4)
[1969] 2 MLJ 52 [2001] 7 CLJ 633 [2009] 4 CLJ 57 [2010] 7 CLJ 917