RAGUNATH A/L VADIVELOO v DINITA A/P MADHAVAN

ja-24f-173-05-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 8 October 2025 • JA-24F-173-05/2025 • 9 min read

Outcome

Accordingly, I allowed the PH’s application via Enclosure 23 with no order as to costs.

Quoted verbatim from the judgment of High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) (ja-24f-173-05-2025). Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal for the complete decision.

Catchwords

Family Law — Interim Access of the child — Deny access by the Defendant — Whether the Plaintiff as the father of the child is allowed to continue having access to the child pending the disposal of Originating Summons for custody, care and control of the child filed by the Plaintiff

Practice Areas

Family Law Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Wong Mee Ling Delivered

Counsel (5)

N. Ahilan & Associates Firm Raman Velu, Meachery Jo-Anne & Co. Firm J. Chandrika Counsel Plaintiff Jo-Anne Joseph Counsel Plaintiff N. Ahilan Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

Dinita a/p Madhavan Respondent Ragunath a/l Vadiveloo Applicant

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ja-24f-173-05-2025)