NZ BINA SDN BHD v 1. ) REAPLITE INDUSTRY SDN BHD 2. ) OCBC BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD PIHAK TERKILAN Kerajaan Malaysia

ja-22ncvc-275-12-2017 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 13 February 2025 • JA-22NCvC-275-12/2017

Catchwords

• 1st Defendant’s scope based on Main Contract (Cl. A(1)) • Must comply with instructions from Plaintiff/JKR (Cl. A(3)) • Main Contract terms apply on back-to-back basis (Cl. C(3)) • Contract duration: 18.3.2014 - 14.3.2016 (Cl. D) • Plaintiff may terminate by written notice (Cl. N(14)) • Defendant must prove facts put to Plaintiff’s witnesses • Failure to adduce evidence = deemed acceptance of witness’s testimony • Referenced case: Muhamad Qamarul v Md Nor [2020] MLJU 106 • Principle supported by Mahadev Shankar’s article on cross-examination • Plaintiff’s claim dismissed for lack of convincing proof

Practice Areas

• 1st Defendant’s scope based on Main Contract (Cl. A(1)) • Must comply with instructions from Plaintiff/JKR (Cl. A(3)) • Main Contract terms apply on back-to-back basis (Cl. C(3)) • Contract duration: 18.3.2014

Judges (1)

Nurulhuda Nur'aini binti Mohamad Nor Delivered

Parties (4)

Kerajaan Malaysia Aggrieved Party NZ BINA Sdn Bhd Plaintiff OCBC Bank Berhad Defendant REAPLITE INDUSTRY Sdn Bhd Defendant

Case Significance

NZ BINA SDN BHD v 1. ) REAPLITE INDUSTRY SDN BHD 2. ) OCBC BANK (MALAYSIA) BE... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated February 13, 2025 (citation: ja-22ncvc-275-12-2017). The case was decided by Nurulhuda Nur'aini binti Mohamad Nor.

What was the outcome of NZ BINA SDN BHD v 1. ) REAPLITE INDUSTRY SDN BHD 2. ) OCBC BANK (MALAYSIA) BE...?

NZ BINA SDN BHD v 1. ) REAPLITE INDUSTRY SDN BHD 2. ) OCBC BANK (MALAYSIA) BE... is a High Court decision dated February 13, 2025. The case was heard by Nurulhuda Nur'aini binti Mohamad Nor. See the full judgment for details.