POH HENG HAULAGE SDN BHD v 1. ) PERNIAGAAN USAHASAMA MEMBALAK SDN. BHD. 2. ) Ng Yong Chee-telah Dikeluarkan Melalui O.18 3. ) NG YONG SIONG 4. ) Azis Satar Bin Satari-telah Dikeluarkan Melalui O.18

ja-22ncc-53-06-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 29 January 2026 • JA-22NCC-53-06/2025 • 9 min read

Catchwords

Prosedur Sivil — Aturan 18 kaedah 19(1)(a), (b) dan (d) Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 — Permohonan membatalkan tindakan — Ketiadaan kausa tindakan munasabah — Dakwaan penipuan — Keperluan pleading yang khusus dan terperinci — Seksyen 540 Akta Syarikat 2016 — Penyingkapan tirai korporat — Entiti perundangan berasingan — Liabiliti peribadi pengarah — Pleading bersifat umum dan kesimpulan undang-undang — Isu perbicaraan tidak timbul — Penyalahgunaan proses Mahkamah — Tindakan terhadap defendan dibatalkan — Permohonan dibenarkan — Kos dalam kausa

Practice Areas

Prosedur Sivil

Judges (1)

Manira binti Mohd Nor Delivered

Counsel (4)

Aizalian Asmadi & Co. Firm Pang Kiat, Yu Qi Law Chamber Firm Aizalian Asmadi & Co. Counsel Defendant Lim Pang Kiat Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (5)

PERNIAGAAN USAHASAMA MEMBALAK Sdn Bhd Defendant POH HENG HAULAGE Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Azis Satar bin Satari-telah Dikeluarkan Melalui O.18 Defendant Ng Yong Chee-telah Dikeluarkan Melalui O.18 Defendant Ng Yong Siong Defendant

Case Significance

POH HENG HAULAGE SDN BHD v 1. ) PERNIAGAAN USAHASAMA MEMBALAK SDN. BHD. 2. ) ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 29, 2026 (citation: ja-22ncc-53-06-2025). <p>Poh Heng Haulage sued four defendants including Perniagaan Usahasama Membalak and its directors for debts, seeking to pierce the corporate veil under Section 540 of the Companies Act 2016. The 2nd and 4th defendants applied to strike out the action under Order 18 Rule 19. The court allowed the strike-out, finding that the plaintiff failed to plead specific facts supporting personal liability of the directors and that the fraud allegations were insufficiently particularised.</p> The case was decided by Manira binti Mohd Nor. Counsel appearing: Aizalian Asmadi & Co. (counsel for defendant), Lim Pang Kiat (counsel for plaintiff).

Summary

Poh Heng Haulage sued four defendants including Perniagaan Usahasama Membalak and its directors for debts, seeking to pierce the corporate veil under Section 540 of the Companies Act 2016. The 2nd and 4th defendants applied to strike out the action under Order 18 Rule 19. The court allowed the strike-out, finding that the plaintiff failed to plead specific facts supporting personal liability of the directors and that the fraud allegations were insufficiently particularised.

What was the outcome of POH HENG HAULAGE SDN BHD v 1. ) PERNIAGAAN USAHASAMA MEMBALAK SDN. BHD. 2. ) ...?

<p>Poh Heng Haulage sued four defendants including Perniagaan Usahasama Membalak and its directors for debts, seeking to pierce the corporate veil und...