TAN KA HAN v AIA BHD.
Catchwords
1. The Plaintiff’s application for discovery (Enclosure 8) is allowed in part, limited to documents relating to compensation, commission, policy portfolio, investigation and LIAM referral. 2. The Defendant’s application to strike out portions of the Statement of Claim (Enclosure 10) is dismissed as the issues raised warrant a full trial. 3. The Defendant’s application for consolidation and transfer (Enclosure 12) is allowed; this suit is transferred to the Kuala Lumpur High Court (Commercial Division) and consolidated with Suit No. WA-22NCC-858-12/2024 for joint case management and trial. 4. Costs in the cause.
Practice Areas
1. The Plaintiff’s application for discovery (Enclosure 8) is allowed in part, limited to documents relating to compensation, commission, policy portfolio, investigation and LIAM referral. 2. The Defendant’s application to strike out portions of the Statement of Claim (Enclosure 10) is dismissed as the issues raised warrant a full trial. 3. The Defendant’s application for consolidation and transfer (Enclosure 12) is allowed; this suit is transferred to the Kuala Lumpur High Court (Commercial Division) and consolidated with Suit No. WA-22NCC-858-12/2024 for joint case management and trial. 4. Costs in the cause.
Judges (1)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
TAN KA HAN v AIA BHD. is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 29, 2025 (citation: ja-22ncc-25-03-2025). The case was decided by Noradura binti Hamzah.
Key issues: 1. The Plaintiff’s application for discovery (Enclosure 8) is allowed in part, limited to documents relating to compensation, commission, policy portfolio, investigation and LIAM referral..
What was the outcome of TAN KA HAN v AIA BHD.?
TAN KA HAN v AIA BHD. is a High Court decision dated September 29, 2025. The case was heard by Noradura binti Hamzah. See the full judgment for details.