1. ) Lim Wei Ying 2. ) Caramay Malaysian Sdn Bhd v TE Electrical Sdn Bhd
Catchwords
1. Plaintiffs satisfied Order 14 prerequisites. 2. Prima facie infringement of CARAMAY trademark proven. 3. Defendant failed to raise any genuine triable issue. 4. Summary judgment granted. 5. Final injunction issued. 6. Delivery up / destruction of infringing goods ordered. 7. Disclosure of supplier details within 14 days. 8. Inquiry on damages (or account of profits). 9. Costs RM7,000 to Plaintiffs.
Practice Areas
1. Plaintiffs satisfied Order 14 prerequisites. 2. Prima facie infringement of CARAMAY trademark proven. 3. Defendant failed to raise any genuine triable issue. 4. Summary judgment granted. 5. Final injunction issued. 6. Delivery up / destruction of infringing goods ordered. 7. Disclosure of supplier details within 14 days. 8. Inquiry on damages (or account of profits). 9. Costs RM7,000 to Plaintiffs.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
1. ) Lim Wei Ying 2. ) Caramay Malaysian Sdn Bhd v TE Electrical Sdn Bhd is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 29, 2025 (citation: ja-22ip-4-07-2024). The case was decided by Noradura binti Hamzah.
Key issues: 1. Plaintiffs satisfied Order 14 prerequisites..
What was the outcome of 1. ) Lim Wei Ying 2. ) Caramay Malaysian Sdn Bhd v TE Electrical Sdn Bhd?
1. ) Lim Wei Ying 2. ) Caramay Malaysian Sdn Bhd v TE Electrical Sdn Bhd is a High Court decision dated September 29, 2025. The case was heard by Noradura binti Hamzah. See the full judgment for details.