PROVENTUS BINA SDN BHD v FORTIS STAR SDN BHD
Catchwords
1. This is an appeal by the Appellant (“Defendant”) against the Sessions Court’s decision dated 24 September 2024 which allowed the Respondent’s (“Plaintiff”) claim for RM401,582.00, with interest and costs. 2. The Defendant appealed on the grounds that inadmissible documents were wrongly accepted. 3. Upon review, this Court finds that the documents were properly admitted under section 90A of the Evidence Act 1950 and that the Plaintiff had proven delivery and acceptance of goods. 4. There is no error warranting appellate intervention. 5. The appeal is dismissed with costs of RM6,000.00, subject to allocator.
Practice Areas
1. This is an appeal by the Appellant (“Defendant”) against the Sessions Court’s decision dated 24 September 2024 which allowed the Respondent’s (“Plaintiff”) claim for RM401,582.00, with interest and costs. 2. The Defendant appealed on the grounds that inadmissible documents were wrongly accepted. 3. Upon review, this Court finds that the documents were properly admitted under section 90A of the Evidence Act 1950 and that the Plaintiff had proven delivery and acceptance of goods. 4. There is no error warranting appellate intervention. 5. The appeal is dismissed with costs of RM6,000.00, subject to allocator.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
PROVENTUS BINA SDN BHD v FORTIS STAR SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 29, 2025 (citation: ja-12bncc-4-01-2025). The case was decided by Noradura binti Hamzah.
Key issues: 2. The Defendant appealed on the grounds that inadmissible documents were wrongly accepted..
What was the outcome of PROVENTUS BINA SDN BHD v FORTIS STAR SDN BHD?
PROVENTUS BINA SDN BHD v FORTIS STAR SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated September 29, 2025. The case was heard by Noradura binti Hamzah. See the full judgment for details.