SIN YAP EXCAVATING & BUILDING WORKS v 1. ) TAN KIM TIONG 2. ) TAN CHERK YIK
Catchwords
1. Appeal against Sessions Court refusal to amend Statement of Claim. 2. Amendment sought after omission discovered during trial. 3. Principles: O20 r5 ROC 2012; Yamaha; Hong Leong Finance. 4. Preliminary issue: appealability under s.28(1)(a) CJA 1964. 5. Definition of “decision” - s.3 CJA; interlocutory ruling. 6. Authorities: Asia Pacific Higher Learning; Kempadang Bersatu; Christopher AK Bandi. 7. Mid-trial amendment = non-final ruling; not appealable. 8. Appeal incompetent in limine. 9. Appeal dismissed; costs RM6,000.00.
Practice Areas
1. Appeal against Sessions Court refusal to amend Statement of Claim. 2. Amendment sought after omission discovered during trial. 3. Principles: O20 r5 ROC 2012; Yamaha; Hong Leong Finance. 4. Preliminary issue: appealability under s.28(1)(a) CJA 1964. 5. Definition of “decision” 6. Authorities: Asia Pacific Higher Learning; Kempadang Bersatu; Christopher AK Bandi. 7. Mid-trial amendment = non-final ruling; not appealable. 8. Appeal incompetent in limine. 9. Appeal dismissed; costs RM6,000.00.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
SIN YAP EXCAVATING & BUILDING WORKS v 1. ) TAN KIM TIONG 2. ) TAN CHERK YIK is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 29, 2025 (citation: ja-12ancc-4-02-2025). The case was decided by Noradura binti Hamzah.
Key issues: 1. Appeal against Sessions Court refusal to amend Statement of Claim..
What was the outcome of SIN YAP EXCAVATING & BUILDING WORKS v 1. ) TAN KIM TIONG 2. ) TAN CHERK YIK?
SIN YAP EXCAVATING & BUILDING WORKS v 1. ) TAN KIM TIONG 2. ) TAN CHERK YIK is a High Court decision dated September 29, 2025. The case was heard by Noradura binti Hamzah. See the full judgment for details.