1. ) QALIF AMSYAR BIN ZULFADHIL 2. ) AMMAR ILMAN BIN ZULFADHIL 3. ) MIA ZARA AISYAH BINTI NORSARIMAN 4. ) NOOR IDHAM BIN SULAIMAN v 1. ) AHMAD RIFAAH BIN MOHAMED 2. ) MOHD EZWAN BIN ISMAIL

da-24ncvc-223-06-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 November 2025 • DA-24NCvC-223-06/2025 • 1 min read

Catchwords

SAMAN PEMULA: Samada tindakan untuk mempertahankan tanah pusaka oleh waris-waris memerlukan surat kuasa mentadbir - samada konsep pemegang amanah konstruktif adalah absolute dan selamanya - samada borang pindah milik secara escrow adalah satu pindah milik yang sah dan boleh didaftarkan - samada pembeli sucihati terdekat berhak mendapat perlindungan di bawah seksyen 340 KTN - syarat-syarat untuk pembeli menjadi pemilik beneficial setelah membayar keseluruhan harga jual beli.

Practice Areas

SAMAN PEMULA: Samada tindakan untuk mempertahankan tanah pusaka oleh waris-waris memerlukan surat kuasa mentadbir

Judges (1)

Mohd Rosli bin Yusoff Delivered

Counsel (4)

Rafizah Azwan & Associates Firm Zaidan & Associates Firm Mat Zaidan Bin Ali Counsel Applicant Raihana Ashikeen Binti Ramlan Counsel Respondent

Parties (6)

Ahmad Rifaah bin Mohamed Respondent Ammar Ilman bin Zulfadhil Applicant Mia Zara Aisyah binti Norsariman Applicant Mohd Ezwan bin Ismail Respondent Noor Idham bin Sulaiman Applicant Qalif Amsyar bin Zulfadhil Applicant

Case Significance

1. ) QALIF AMSYAR BIN ZULFADHIL 2. ) AMMAR ILMAN BIN ZULFADHIL 3. ) MIA ZARA ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 18, 2025 (citation: da-24ncvc-223-06-2025). <p>Heirs sought to recover ancestral land transferred through a fraudulent escrow form. The High Court ordered the land returned, finding the escrow transfer was invalid and the respondents were not bona fide purchasers entitled to protection under s.340 of the National Land Code.</p> The case was decided by Mohd Rosli bin Yusoff. Counsel appearing: Mat Zaidan Bin Ali (counsel for applicant), Raihana Ashikeen Binti Ramlan (counsel for respondent).

Summary

Heirs sought to recover ancestral land transferred through a fraudulent escrow form. The High Court ordered the land returned, finding the escrow transfer was invalid and the respondents were not bona fide purchasers entitled to protection under s.340 of the National Land Code.

What was the outcome of 1. ) QALIF AMSYAR BIN ZULFADHIL 2. ) AMMAR ILMAN BIN ZULFADHIL 3. ) MIA ZARA ...?

<p>Heirs sought to recover ancestral land transferred through a fraudulent escrow form. The High Court ordered the land returned, finding the escrow t...