Roslee Bin Jaafar & 43 Lagi v 1. ) AFTER IMAGE SDN BHD 2. ) MAJLIS DAERAH TANAH MERAH 3. ) KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN KERJA RAYA MALAYSIA 4. ) PENGARAH JABATAN KERJA RAYA NEGERI KELANTAN 5. ) KERAJAAN MALAYSIA

da-21ncvc-3-01-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 8 December 2025 • DA-21NCvC-3-01/2025 • 11 min read

4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign)

Catchwords

Notice of Application to strike out the Plaintiffs’ Writ and Statement of Claim under Order 18 Rule 19 (1) (b) and/or (d) of the Rules of Court 2012 -Whether The Plaintiffs have a cause of action against the Second Defendant - Time limitation and applicability of the provisions of Public Authority Protection Act 1948 to the Second Defendant.

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Mohd Rosli bin Yusoff Delivered

Counsel (9)

Adli Aznam & Akram Firm Rithauddeen & Aziz Firm Shaharuddin Hidayu & Marwaliz Firm Aisyah Basirah Binti Mohd Nooruldeen Counsel Defendant Nur Shafika binti Mustaffa Counsel Plaintiff Nurnajihah Binti Mat Rani Counsel Defendant Nurul Hanani Binti Ismail Counsel Defendant Nuur Zul Izzati Binti Zulkipli Counsel Defendant Wan Nor Idayu Binti Wan Jusoh Counsel Defendant

Parties (6)

AFTER IMAGE Sdn Bhd Defendant KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN KERJA RAYA MALAYSIA Defendant Kerajaan Malaysia Defendant MAJLIS DAERAH TANAH MERAH Defendant PENGARAH JABATAN KERJA RAYA NEGERI KELANTAN Defendant Roslee bin Jaafar Plaintiff

Case Significance

Roslee Bin Jaafar & 43 Lagi v 1. ) AFTER IMAGE SDN BHD 2. ) MAJLIS DAERAH TAN... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated December 8, 2025 (citation: da-21ncvc-3-01-2025). <p>Forty-four plaintiffs sued over damage from a road construction project. The High Court struck out the claim against the District Council, finding no cause of action and that the claim was time-barred under the Public Authority Protection Act 1948. Costs of RM8,000 were awarded.</p> The case was decided by Mohd Rosli bin Yusoff. Counsel appearing: Aisyah Basirah Binti Mohd Nooruldeen (counsel for defendant), Nur Shafika binti Mustaffa (counsel for plaintiff), Nurnajihah Binti Mat Rani (counsel for defendant), Nurul Hanani Binti Ismail (counsel for defendant), Nuur Zul Izzati Binti Zulkipli (counsel for defendant), Wan Nor Idayu Binti Wan Jusoh (counsel for defendant).

Summary

Forty-four plaintiffs sued over damage from a road construction project. The High Court struck out the claim against the District Council, finding no cause of action and that the claim was time-barred under the Public Authority Protection Act 1948. Costs of RM8,000 were awarded.

What was the outcome of Roslee Bin Jaafar & 43 Lagi v 1. ) AFTER IMAGE SDN BHD 2. ) MAJLIS DAERAH TAN...?

<p>Forty-four plaintiffs sued over damage from a road construction project. The High Court struck out the claim against the District Council, finding ...

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (4)

UK (2)

[1965] 1 QB 232 [1973] 1 WLR 1019

MY (2)

[1988] 2 MLJ 12 [1997] 4 CLJ 669