LI FEN v 1. ) YIP KAI JUNG 2. ) NUR ALISYA EZLYN BINTI ABDULLAH 3. ) R&R REDROSE CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING SDN. BHD 4. ) FOONG MAN LI 5. ) FOUR STORY SDN. BHD 6. ) WEE SENG YEO 7. ) GUO XIUQI 8. ) LEAN YUNG KWANG

ca-22ncvc-26-07-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 15 May 2025 • CA-22NCvC-26-07/2024

Catchwords

Proprietary & Freezing Injunctions – injunction meant at preserving and restraining defendants from dealing with the plaintiffs’ assets or assets over which the plaintiffs has existing proprietary rights – Alleged fraud/misappropriation of money transferred from the Plaintiff Company’s account and held in the bank accounts of R&R Redrose Construction – Proprietary Injunction: requirement to prove constructive trust – Freezing Injunction: requirement to prove existence of an arguable case, defendants have assets within the jurisdiction of the court and there is risk of dissipation of assets – Consolidation under Order 4, Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 201 : consolidation of proceedings generally not ordered unless there exist common questions of law and fact, real likelihood of inconsistent judgments – Proprietary, Freezing Injunction and consolidation application allowed.

Practice Areas

Proprietary & Freezing Injunctions

Judges (1)

Mohd Radzi bin Harun Delivered

Parties (9)

FOUR STORY Sdn Bhd Defendant R&R REDROSE CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING Sdn Bhd Defendant Foong Man Li Defendant Guo Xiuqi Defendant Lean Yung Kwang Defendant Li Fen Plaintiff Nur Alisya Ezlyn binti Abdullah Defendant Wee Seng Yeo Defendant Yip Kai Jung Defendant

Case Significance

LI FEN v 1. ) YIP KAI JUNG 2. ) NUR ALISYA EZLYN BINTI ABDULLAH 3. ) R&R REDR... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 15, 2025 (citation: ca-22ncvc-26-07-2024). The case was decided by Mohd Radzi bin Harun.

What was the outcome of LI FEN v 1. ) YIP KAI JUNG 2. ) NUR ALISYA EZLYN BINTI ABDULLAH 3. ) R&R REDR...?

LI FEN v 1. ) YIP KAI JUNG 2. ) NUR ALISYA EZLYN BINTI ABDULLAH 3. ) R&R REDR... is a High Court decision dated May 15, 2025. The case was heard by Mohd Radzi bin Harun. See the full judgment for details.