1. ) MOHD AMRAN BIN WAHID 2. ) CHAI THAM POH 3. ) KISHORE KUMAR A/L GANDI v 1. ) NURUL FATHANI BINTI MD ISA 2. ) Tetuan Zainy & Partners (disaman sebagai sebuah firma guaman) 3. ) Tetuan Shahdan Anuar & Jamaludin (disaman sebagai sebuah firma guaman) 4. ) LIU CHANG SHIN 5. ) LIU CHANG SENG 6. ) LIU CHANG CHONG 7. ) LIU CHANG YEE 8. ) LIOW CHANG JEN 9. ) LIU CHEW MOI 10. ) LIU CHIEW SHA 11. ) LIU CHUN FONG 12. ) Syed Ali Badarudin Bin Syed Othman PENCELAH DICADANGKAN 1. ) SHARIPAH ZAINY BINTI ...
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (18)
Tetuan Shahdan Anuar & Jamaludin Defendant Tetuan Zainy & Partners Defendant Chai Tham Poh Plaintiff Irmayany binti Umar Proposed Intervener Kishore Kumar a/l Gandi Plaintiff Latifah binti Sheikh Hassan Proposed Intervener Liow Chang Jen Defendant Liu Chang Chong Defendant Liu Chang Seng Defendant Liu Chang Shin Defendant Liu Chang Yee Defendant Liu Chew Moi Defendant Liu Chiew Sha Defendant Liu Chun Fong Defendant Mohd Amran bin Wahid Plaintiff Nurul Fathani binti Md Isa Defendant Sharipah Zainy binti Syed Ager Proposed Intervener Syed Ali Badarudin bin Syed Othman Defendant
Case Significance
1. ) MOHD AMRAN BIN WAHID 2. ) CHAI THAM POH 3. ) KISHORE KUMAR A/L GANDI v 1... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 7, 2025 (citation: ca-22ncvc-13-03-2025). The case was decided by Mohd Radzi bin Harun.
What was the outcome of 1. ) MOHD AMRAN BIN WAHID 2. ) CHAI THAM POH 3. ) KISHORE KUMAR A/L GANDI v 1...?
1. ) MOHD AMRAN BIN WAHID 2. ) CHAI THAM POH 3. ) KISHORE KUMAR A/L GANDI v 1... is a High Court decision dated October 7, 2025. The case was heard by Mohd Radzi bin Harun. See the full judgment for details.