1. ) HATIJAH BINTI IBRAHIM 2. ) DIYANA BINTI NORDIN 3. ) HALIMA BINTI IBRAHIM 4. ) SALASIAH BINTI IBRAHIM 5. ) MOHD SHAWAL BIN IBRAHIM v 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Gombak 2. ) TANIA RAHMAWATI BINTI YUSOF 3. ) MD ZIN BIN HAMID PENTADBIR HARTA PUSAKA BAGI SHARIFAH BINTI IBRAHIM SI MATI 4. ) ABDUL KARIM BIN IBRAHIM 5. ) NORSAHIDA BINTI ZAINUDDIN
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (10)
Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Gombak Respondent Abdul Karim bin Ibrahim Respondent Diyana binti Nordin Applicant Halima binti Ibrahim Applicant Hatijah binti Ibrahim Applicant Md Zin bin Hamid Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Bagi Sharifah binti Ibrahim Si Mati Respondent Mohd Shawal bin Ibrahim Applicant Norsahida binti Zainuddin Respondent Salasiah binti Ibrahim Applicant Tania Rahmawati binti Yusof Respondent
Case Significance
1. ) HATIJAH BINTI IBRAHIM 2. ) DIYANA BINTI NORDIN 3. ) HALIMA BINTI IBRAHIM... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 21, 2025 (citation: ba-24ncvc-2579-11-2024). The case was decided by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat.
What was the outcome of 1. ) HATIJAH BINTI IBRAHIM 2. ) DIYANA BINTI NORDIN 3. ) HALIMA BINTI IBRAHIM...?
1. ) HATIJAH BINTI IBRAHIM 2. ) DIYANA BINTI NORDIN 3. ) HALIMA BINTI IBRAHIM... is a High Court decision dated September 21, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat. See the full judgment for details.