1. ) BALAMANI A/P SUBRAMANIAM 2. ) NAVARASAN A/L RAMAKRISHNAN 3. ) MUNIANDY A/L MANIKAM 4. ) RAMAKRISHNAN A/L RAJA GOPAL 5. ) JEGASILAN A/L KUNGAMBOO 6. ) PERIYASAMY A/L NARAYANASAMY 7. ) RAMAIYAH A/L KESAVAN 8. ) BALAKRISHNAN A/L MUNIANDY 9. ) MANOGERAN A/L KRISHNAN 10. ) P.SUNDARASEKARAR A/L PERUMAL v MALAYSIA HINDU SANGAM
Catchwords
Company Law – Internal organisational dispute – AGM validity – Proxy voting – Delegate verification – Election procedures – Removal of State Chairmen – Articles of Association – Powers of Central Council – Co-opted members – Whether State Chairmen have locus standi – 2023 High Court decision determining rights of State Chairmen. Civil Procedure – Injunction – Ex parte injunction – Order 29 Rule 1(2C) ROC – Statutory prohibition against restraining meetings of a body corporate – Whether Court has jurisdiction to grant ex parte relief stopping CCM – Mandatory requirements of Order 29 Rule 2A – Full and frank disclosure – Failure to disclose adverse facts – Suppression of binding authority – Defective undertaking as to damages – Whether injunction void ab initio. Equity – Duty of candour – Material non-disclosure – Failure to disclose applicable defences – Adequacy of undertaking – Balance of convenience – Serious issue to be tried – Whether Plaintiffs’ fears amount to irreparable harm – Whether injunction causes disproportionate prejudice to Defendant – American Cyanamid principles. Corporate Governance – Majority rule – Foss v Harbottle – Judicial non-intervention in internal management – Validity of AGM decisions – Timing of election – Delegate eligibility – Procedural regularity – Whether Court should intervene in voluntary associations absent illegality or ultra vires conduct.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (11)
Balakrishnan a/l Muniandy Applicant Balamani a/p Subramaniam Applicant Jegasilan a/l Kungamboo Applicant Malaysia Hindu Sangam Respondent Manogeran a/l Krishnan Applicant Muniandy a/l Manikam Applicant Navarasan a/l Ramakrishnan Applicant P.sundarasekarar a/l Perumal Applicant Periyasamy a/l Narayanasamy Applicant Ramaiyah a/l Kesavan Applicant Ramakrishnan a/l Raja Gopal Applicant
Case Significance
1. ) BALAMANI A/P SUBRAMANIAM 2. ) NAVARASAN A/L RAMAKRISHNAN 3. ) MUNIANDY A... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 15, 2025 (citation: ba-24ncc-106-10-2025). The case was decided by Asmah binti Musa.
What was the outcome of 1. ) BALAMANI A/P SUBRAMANIAM 2. ) NAVARASAN A/L RAMAKRISHNAN 3. ) MUNIANDY A...?
1. ) BALAMANI A/P SUBRAMANIAM 2. ) NAVARASAN A/L RAMAKRISHNAN 3. ) MUNIANDY A... is a High Court decision dated October 15, 2025. The case was heard by Asmah binti Musa. See the full judgment for details.