1. ) I TRADE (HK) LTD 2. ) HARMONY IMPORTS LIMITED 3. ) EVER HAPPY (HONG KONG) LIMITED 4. ) Ravjot Bhasin v 1. ) MOHD ZHAFRI BIN AMINURASHID 2. ) FAHMI BIN ADILAH 3. ) NORMAN BIN MOHD NASIR 4. ) MOHAMAD ASHRAF BIN AHMAD SOHAIMI 5. ) MUHAMMAD SYAFIQ BIN SALLEH 6. ) LAW CHAMBERS OF ZHAFRI AMINURASHID 7. ) XFYRE (M) SDN BHD 8. ) Tan Cheng Hooi 9. ) Nur Juwairiah Binti Mohd Azmi

ba-22ncvc-502-12-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 3 September 2025 • BA-22NCvC-502-12/2023 • 13 min read

4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign)

Catchwords

Mahkamah ini mendapati dalam mengaplikasikan prinsip undang-undang dalam kes Yamaha Motor ianya perlu dipakai dengan adil dalam memutuskan mengenai pindaan kepada writ saman dan pernyataan tuntutan. Berdasarkan itu, Mahkamah ini membenarkan permohonan pindaan kepada writ saman dan pernyataan tuntutan Plaintif-Plaintif.

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Rozi binti Bainon Delivered

Counsel (10)

Jimmy Goh & Partners Firm The Chambers of Syed Nur Aiman Firm Wong Hok Mun Partnership Firm Yeoh Shim Siow & Lay Kuan Firm Chew Chee Hui Counsel Plaintiff Jimmy Goh Thian Szu Counsel Defendant Lim Jian Heng Counsel Plaintiff Syed Nur Aiman bin Syed Abdul Hamid Counsel Defendant Tan Ying Xuan Counsel Defendant Wong Hok Mun Counsel Defendant

Parties (13)

EVER HAPPY (HONG KONG) LIMITED Plaintiff HARMONY IMPORTS LIMITED Plaintiff I TRADE LTD Plaintiff XFYRE Sdn Bhd Defendant Fahmi bin Adilah Defendant Law Chambers Of Zhafri Aminurashid Defendant Mohamad Ashraf bin Ahmad Sohaimi Defendant Mohd Zhafri bin Aminurashid Defendant Muhammad Syafiq bin Salleh Defendant Norman bin Mohd Nasir Defendant Nur Juwairiah binti Mohd Azmi Defendant Ravjot Bhasin Plaintiff Tan Cheng Hooi Defendant

Case Significance

1. ) I TRADE (HK) LTD 2. ) HARMONY IMPORTS LIMITED 3. ) EVER HAPPY (HONG KONG... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 3, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-502-12-2023). <p>Four Hong Kong and US-based plaintiffs sought to amend their writ and statement of claim to add new plaintiffs and correct company details in a suit against former law firm partners and other defendants. The High Court allowed the amendment application, applying the principles from Yamaha Motor fairly, noting that the appeal by the 2nd to 5th defendants would become academic as their case was disposed of at full trial.</p> The case was decided by Rozi binti Bainon. Counsel appearing: Chew Chee Hui (counsel for plaintiff), Jimmy Goh Thian Szu (counsel for defendant), Lim Jian Heng (counsel for plaintiff), Syed Nur Aiman bin Syed Abdul Hamid (counsel for defendant), Tan Ying Xuan (counsel for defendant), Wong Hok Mun (counsel for defendant).

Summary

Four Hong Kong and US-based plaintiffs sought to amend their writ and statement of claim to add new plaintiffs and correct company details in a suit against former law firm partners and other defendants. The High Court allowed the amendment application, applying the principles from Yamaha Motor fairly, noting that the appeal by the 2nd to 5th defendants would become academic as their case was disposed of at full trial.

What was the outcome of 1. ) I TRADE (HK) LTD 2. ) HARMONY IMPORTS LIMITED 3. ) EVER HAPPY (HONG KONG...?

<p>Four Hong Kong and US-based plaintiffs sought to amend their writ and statement of claim to add new plaintiffs and correct company details in a sui...

Cases Cited (4)

MY (4)

[1983] 1 MLJ 213 [2009] 1 MLJ 108 [2016] 1 MLJ 301 [2020] 12 MLJ 121