1. ) HO SZE KEEN 2. ) TOH OOI PENG 3. ) SURIA FIRST HOLDINGS SDN BHD v ARA HILL JOINT MANAGEMENT BODY

ba-22ncvc-464-11-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 30 November 2025 • BA-22NCvC-464-11/2023 • 14 min read
6 cases cited (0 SG, 6 foreign)

Catchwords

PENGURUSAN KES: Writ Saman dan Pernyataan Tuntutan dibatalkan pada 1.12.2025 berdasarkan Aturan 34 Kaedah 2(3) Kaedah-kaedah Mahkamah (KKM) 2012 – Mahkamah telah memberi arahan berkaitan pemfailan dokumen pra bicara semasa sesi Pengurusan Kes dan tarikh perbicaraan telah ditetapkan – Arahan Mahkamah dipersetujui oleh peguam cara bagi kedua-dua pihak – Selanjutnya permohonan interlokutori di bawah Aturan 14 KKM 2012 telah ditetapkan untuk pendengaran – Semasa tarikh pendengaran, peguam cara plaintif mencadangkan supaya isu undang-undang diputuskan bersama dengan isu fakta selepas perbicaraan penuh dan dipersetujui oleh peguam cara defendan - Mahkamah menerima hasrat pihak-pihak dan sekali lagi mengingatkan supaya kesemua dokumen pra perbicaraan difailkan pada atau sebelum 30.11.2025 dan tarikh Pengurusan Kes pada 1.12.2025 dikekalkan – Pihak-pihak gagal memfailkan dokumen-dokumen pra bicara kecuali Ikatan Pliding dengan alasan terlibat dengan kes di Mahkamah Pembinaan yang melibatkan pihak-pihak yang sama – Peguam cara plaintif memohon masa untuk melengkapkan dokumen-dokumen dan tidak menjelaskan alasan kegagalan pematuhan arahan pra bicara walau pun tempoh enam bulan telah diberikan oleh Mahkamah. TATACARA SIVIL: Pengurusan Kes pra bicara boleh diarahkan oleh Mahkamah - Perspektif baharu dalam peranan proaktif Mahkamah semasa pengurusan kes bagi memastikan kelancaran dalam pendengaran dan pelupusan kes di Mahkamah - Aturan 34 KKM 2012.

Practice Areas

PENGURUSAN KES: Writ Saman dan Pernyataan Tuntutan dibatalkan pada 1.12.2025 berdasarkan Aturan 34 Kaedah 2(3) Kaedah-kaedah Mahkamah (KKM) 2012

Judges (1)

Hazizah binti Kassim Delivered

Counsel (2)

Lui & Bhullar Firm Sophia Au May San Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

SURIA FIRST HOLDINGS Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Ara Hill Joint Management Body Defendant Ho Sze Keen Plaintiff Toh Ooi Peng Plaintiff

Case Significance

1. ) HO SZE KEEN 2. ) TOH OOI PENG 3. ) SURIA FIRST HOLDINGS SDN BHD v ARA HI... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 30, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-464-11-2023). <p>Three property owners filed suit against the Ara Hill Joint Management Body over defects including gas pipeline hazards and structural cracks. The court struck out the Writ and Statement of Claim under Order 34 Rule 2(3) of the Rules of Court 2012 after the plaintiffs failed to comply with pre-trial directions to file documents within the six-month deadline, and no application to set aside the order was filed.</p> The case was decided by Hazizah binti Kassim. Counsel appearing: Sophia Au May San (counsel for plaintiff).

Summary

Three property owners filed suit against the Ara Hill Joint Management Body over defects including gas pipeline hazards and structural cracks. The court struck out the Writ and Statement of Claim under Order 34 Rule 2(3) of the Rules of Court 2012 after the plaintiffs failed to comply with pre-trial directions to file documents within the six-month deadline, and no application to set aside the order was filed.

What was the outcome of 1. ) HO SZE KEEN 2. ) TOH OOI PENG 3. ) SURIA FIRST HOLDINGS SDN BHD v ARA HI...?

<p>Three property owners filed suit against the Ara Hill Joint Management Body over defects including gas pipeline hazards and structural cracks. The ...

Cases Cited (6)

UK (1)
[1998] EWCA Civ 1894
MY (5)
[1999] 1 CLJ 703 [2004] 2 CLJ 301 [2004] 3 MLJ 465 [2013] 1 MLJ 461 [2016] 1 MLJ 301