SPNB ASPIRASI SDN BHD v 1. ) WIRADANI DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) AKITEK AKIPRIMA SDN BHD 3. ) DATO SRI UNG ENG HUAT 4. ) DATO CHEAH KAH LIP 5. ) DATUK LEONG YENG KIT 6. ) Ahmad Azizi Bin Haji Ali
Catchwords
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out-Action-Abuse of process of court- Action arising from final arbitration award and subsequent High Court proceedings-Parties then entered consent judgment during appeal in Court of Appeal-Whether case vexatious, frivolous, scandalous and abuse of process of court-Whether ought to be struck out CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out- Action- Action arising from final arbitration award and subsequent High Court proceedings-Parties then entered consent judgment during appeal in Court of Appeal- Res judicata-Allegation that arbitral tribunal had fully determined the same issues- Whether causes of action similar-Whether parties similar-Whether matters and issues in the present action ventilated in previous proceedings CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out-Action-Whether plaintiff’s claim discloses reasonable cause of action against the defendants- Plaintiff alleged the tortious claim in the suit different from contractual issues determined in arbitration-Allegation there was fraud and conspiracy- Pleadings devoid of material particulars required to sustain action of fraud and conspiracy -Whether pleadings satisfy the minimum threshold of clarity and specificity required under O.18 r.7 and 12 of ROC 2012
Practice Areas
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out-Action-Abuse of process of court- Action arising from final arbitration award and subsequent High Court proceedings-Parties then entered consent judgment during appeal in Court of Appeal-Whether case vexatious, frivolous, scandalous and abuse of process of court-Whether ought to be struck out CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out- Action- Action arising from final arbitration award and subsequent High Court proceedings-Parties then entered consent judgment during appeal in Court of Appeal- Res judicata-Allegation that arbitral tribunal had fully determined the same issues- Whether causes of action similar-Whether parties similar-Whether matters and issues in the present action ventilated in previous proceedings CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out-Action-Whether plaintiff’s claim discloses reasonable cause of action against the defendants- Plaintiff alleged the tortious claim in the suit different from contractual issues determined in arbitration-Allegation there was fraud and conspiracy- Pleadings devoid of material particulars required to sustain action of fraud and conspiracy -Whether pleadings satisfy the minimum threshold of clarity and specificity required under O.18 r.7 and 12 of ROC 2012
Judges (1)
Case Significance
SPNB ASPIRASI SDN BHD v 1. ) WIRADANI DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) AKITEK AKIPRIM... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 7, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-399-09-2023). The case was decided by Jamhirah binti Ali.
What was the outcome of SPNB ASPIRASI SDN BHD v 1. ) WIRADANI DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) AKITEK AKIPRIM...?
SPNB ASPIRASI SDN BHD v 1. ) WIRADANI DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) AKITEK AKIPRIM... is a High Court decision dated April 7, 2025. The case was heard by Jamhirah binti Ali. See the full judgment for details.