1. ) RAVINDERJEET KAUR A/P HARBANS SINGH 2. ) DILBIR KAUR A/P HARBANS SINGH 3. ) AMRIT BINTI ABDULLAH 4. ) MOHSEN MANINDER BIN ABDULLAH v 1. ) BHOOPINDAR SINGH A/L HARBANS SINGH 2. ) NUR DIYANAH INDER BINTI ABDULLAH (INDERJEET KAUR A/P HARBANS SINGH)

ba-22ncvc-249-06-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 8 July 2025 • BA-22NCvC-249-06/2024

Catchwords

Civil Procedure - Disposal of action without trial - Beneficiaries’ action against administrators - Whether action is estopped by the doctrine of res judicata in view of two prior consent judgments - Whether the court lack of jurisdiction to grant the relief sought - Whether action time-barred - Sections 6(2), 6(3), 6(6) and 22(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1953

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik Delivered

Parties (6)

Amrit binti Abdullah Plaintiff Bhoopindar Singh a/l Harbans Singh Defendant Dilbir Kaur a/p Harbans Singh Plaintiff Mohsen Maninder bin Abdullah Plaintiff Nur Diyanah Inder binti Abdullah (inderjeet Kaur a/p Harbans Singh) Defendant Ravinderjeet Kaur a/p Harbans Singh Plaintiff

Case Significance

1. ) RAVINDERJEET KAUR A/P HARBANS SINGH 2. ) DILBIR KAUR A/P HARBANS SINGH 3... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 8, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-249-06-2024). The case was decided by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik.

What was the outcome of 1. ) RAVINDERJEET KAUR A/P HARBANS SINGH 2. ) DILBIR KAUR A/P HARBANS SINGH 3...?

1. ) RAVINDERJEET KAUR A/P HARBANS SINGH 2. ) DILBIR KAUR A/P HARBANS SINGH 3... is a High Court decision dated July 8, 2025. The case was heard by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik. See the full judgment for details.